Reviews & Ratings for
Behind the Mask More at IMDbPro »

7 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
Efficient thriller re-teaming Karloff & Van Sloan shortly after the success of 'Frankenstein.', 5 August 2000

Author: Ale fish from Norwich

What must have started life as a pretty ordinary crime picture is dressed up for the box office with some of the popular flourishes of the day such as electronic gadgets and a mysterious criminal mastermind.

Karloff gives excellent value as villain's chief henchman and thankfully gets plenty of screen time.

Although director and cast were all well experienced in pictures, the performances tend to be on the dull side, particularly Jack Holt in the lead. The pace of individual scenes is a little slow too, almost as if everyone concerned were making a conscious effort to hold back from the excesses of the silent days.

No classic, but you could do worse.

8 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
Creepy Columbia Potboiler, 22 September 2005

Author: wdbasinger (wdbasinger@hotmail.com) from Beltsville, Maryland

A macabre mystery with many elements of the supernatural/shudder scientific genres.

Boris Karloff plays a lead henchman in the service of a mysterious Mr. X. His performance does not suggest a red herring role, but he is sinister enough as a grim-faced gangster to keep one's interest throughout the picture. Early on, it seems possible that the sinister Dr. Steiner played by Edward van Sloan may seem to be a more likely candidate for Mr. X., but his performance raises enough doubts to keep the viewer in a constant state of suspense.

A very fine "B" feature for the night owl crowd.

7/10.

Dan Basinger

5 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
Good crime thriller keeps you sitting on the edge of your seat to the end, 22 January 2008

Author: dbborroughs from Glen Cove, New York

Jack Holt escapes from prison and follow the advice of his friend Boris Karloff to go see a certain man if he wants to remain free and make lots of money. Holt does so and soon finds himself working for a mysterious Mr X, who is running a large criminal operation. Holt however is no cook, he is instead a federal agent seeking to break a drug ring.

Made prior to the release of Frankenstein this is a film with Boris Karloff in one of his henchmen supporting roles. He's good but a bit over active. The real star here is Jack Holt who was a big star in the silent days and who's career slowly faded once sound came in. I've always liked Holt and felt he was under appreciated by most people who know who he was (The problem is that most people have no idea at all who he was). Holt here is a rugged leading man and a nice man of action. He is in short the perfect hero.

The film itself is quite good. Going from big house, to country house to doctors office, this is a thriller that keeps you guessing and keeps you interested. Its nice to see a movie that isn't so formulaic that you can connect the dots and know who is doing what before you're told. The action when it comes is well done and there is generally a good amount of suspense, especially in the final moments as it is uncertain if or how out hero will escape the villains clutches.

Worth searching out and perfect for a nice double or triple feature on a dark and stormy night.

1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Just Like a Cliff Hanger Serial Rolled into an Hour!!!, 24 June 2011

Author: kidboots from Australia

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

Jack Holt, at this time, was Columbia's top star, helping, along with Frank Capra, to catapult the studio into the "almost" big time with films like "Submarine", "Flight" and "Dirigible". He was also their workhorse and a funny running gag in the biography "King Cohn" had various male stars going to Harry Cohn for a raise, of which he would agree provided they "don't tell Jack Holt". Holt started work on his latest action film "In the Secret Service" in November 1931 but when "Frankenstein" proved such a big hit, the story was changed to incorporate some gruesome scenes to justify it's publicity as a horror film and given the more ambiguous title of "Behind the Mask".

This has a definite feel of a cliffhanger serial condensed into an tight hour and is a terrific little movie. At the film's start Jack Holt, as Jack Hart is in prison and has made a confidante of Henderson (Boris Karloff). Hart is planning a breakout that night and Henderson, who is due to be released in the lawful way, is suitably impressed and thinks his organisation could use him. But Hart is a secret service man who is on the trail of the elusive Dr. X, whose identity is hidden even from his own gang members. He is given a job as a chauffeur to Arnold (Claude King), a gang member who is having second thoughts about his own involvement - not so his daughter, Julie (Constance Cummings) who makes a friend of Hart and tries to help him in every way. Ruling the house is the dreaded Edwards (Bertha Mann in her last film), the right hand woman of Dr. X, who, when people get too hard to handle, books them into Eastlake Hospital for an "operation".

This opens up the film for some pretty grizzly scenes - dithering Arnold has already been taken to the hospital but is dead by the time Jack and Julie arrive. Julie is then rushed to hospital for an emergency appendectomy where she amazingly overpowers her captors and rushes to save Hart when he is just about to undergo an operation without the use of anesthetic!!! "It is only when I begin to cut on the inside that you will realise an experience. To me it will be ecstasy"!! - fiendish is not too strong a word for Dr. Steiner (Edward Van Sloane), whose evil characterization was up there with Dr. Fu Manchu and the crazed doctor in "The Mystery of the Wax Museum".

A lot of action is packed into the hour, which again gives it a Saturday morning serial feel - an operative (Thomas Jackson, from "Little Caesar") walks off to his death, Hart's duplicity is discovered and Henderson arranges an "accident" at sea and Arnold's body is dug up, only to find his coffin is filled with drugs. Beautiful Constance Cummings was an asset to any movie, she had real intelligence and was not just a pretty face. She gives a lot more to her role than was originally there and really fleshes out her part.

Highly Recommended.

4 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
ANOTHER HORROR PICTURE?, 18 December 2002
Author: whpratt1 from United States

This film was made during the same period as "The Criminal Code" by the same studio. It also used some of the same sets and film footage. During this period,"Frankenstein" was released and Columbia decided to play up Karloff's name and the picture's horror aspects in the advertising. But technically, it is not a horror film. It is exploited as another horror picture, this doesn't horrify sufficiently to class with preceding baby-scarers. The scare stuff seems tossed in regardless of where it fits, but it gets results because KARLOFF's threatening pan makes him a natural for his part.

1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
It's got Karloff...so of course I'd watch it! Too bad it wasn't all that good., 10 November 2010

Author: planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

Although the film has Boris Karloff in it, he is not the star. Jack Holt stars in the movie though today few would recognize this star of the 1920s and 1930s. He died relatively young and his son, Tim, is more well known today.

The film begins with Holt and Karloff in prison and they are talking about getting out--Holt is planning on breaking out and Karloff says he has some friends who will get him out, but is a bit evasive about what this means. A bit later, you see Holt pretending to escape--he apparently is some sort of government agent. Here is the crazy part--to make it look more realistic, he actually shoots himself in the arm in a scene that is a bit hard to watch. A short time later, Holt is able to insinuate himself into a criminal gang, as they buy his story about the escape. It seems that Holt's job is to infiltrate the gang headed by the mysterious 'Mr. X'! For the most part, this is a mindless sort of adventure film--the sort that makes no sense but has one crazy cliff-hanger sort of scene after another. It makes for a brainless but interesting sort of movie--the sort that kids at the time would have liked and parents would have tolerated (or at least tried). When seen today, however, I can't see anyone particularly enjoying this tripe--especially since Karloff lovers like myself just won't get enough of the actor's performance to make it worth our time. Cheap and silly--with little to recommend it.

0 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Fun Action with Karloff and Holt, 21 November 2009
Author: Michael_Elliott from Louisville, KY

Behind the Mask (1932)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Columbia action picture has Jack Holt playing Secret Agent Jack Hart who goes undercover in a prison and befriends the henchman (Boris Karloff) of a maniac passing off various narcotics on the street. Hart isn't able to find his identity but he begins to grow suspicious of a doctor (Edward Van Sloan) who seems to be hiding a few things. Footage from the same studio's THE CRIMINAL CODE was used here as well as several sets from that film so fans of that film might be curious to check this one out, which turns out to be fairly entertaining even though a stronger director probably would have gotten more out of it and raised it beyond its "B" movie roots. What works best is the cast, which also includes Constance Cummings as the lose interest for our main hero. She's pretty good in the film and has wonderful chemistry with Holt whose as stiff as ever but still manages to turn in a good performance. It appears people either love Holt or hate him but I'm somewhere in between. I have often been put off by his stiffness but I think it actually suits his character here quite well. Karloff gets a pretty good role and manages to be in the majority of the first half of the picture. He too makes the film worth checking out as he proves once again that he could do a wide range of roles and didn't require make up to do them. Fans of FRANKENSTEIN will certainly like seeing him and Van Sloan together again. The story itself is pretty simple and straight forward and really doesn't add too many twists or shocks that can't be spotted from a mile away. The film runs a fast paced 68-minutes, which doesn't leave the viewer too many dull moments. Again, I think a stronger director could have rises the material up some but fans of the cast will certainly want to check this one out.

0 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Cheap thrills, 21 September 2006
Author: bensonj from New York, NY

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

This is real Saturday matinée serial stuff, the nonsense plot complete with a drug-running gang of baddies in thrall to a nameless boss that they contact by leaving a message on a primitive Dictaphone's answering machine. Holt is pathetic as a secret service man supposedly infiltrating the gang. Van Sloan plays a villainous M.D. who, for no reason that's apparent, spends his spare time hovering in a room with flashing lights and a Jacob's ladder. His make-up and accent have a distinctly Semitic (or anti-Semitic) shade, but his is the only performance of much interest in the film. The finale does have a nice moment. As Van Sloan prepares to perform a fatal operation on Holt, without anesthesia, he says, "You will be able to bear the pain as I cut through your skin" (demonstrating long cut with finger). "It is only when I cut into your inner parts that you will realize that you are HAVING AN EXPERIENCE!" He then quotes Nietzsche on unbearable pain, and says, "We will find out if this is merely an aphorism." In a intentionally cute switch, it is the girl who saves the nearly nude man bound to the operating table. (That's about all the talented Constance Cummings is given to do in this film.) The explanation of her sudden appearance–"How did you get here?" "His gun dropped to the floor and I grabbed it."–is about as perfunctory as the rest of the film. Is the leader of the Citizens Reform Committee secretly the head of the gang? What do YOU think?

Add another review

Related Links