IMDb > Pardon Us (1931) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb
Pardon Us
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
Overview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany credits
Awards & Reviews
user reviewsexternal reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guidemessage board
Plot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsmemorable quotes
Did You Know?
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
box office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specsliterature listingsNewsDesk
Promotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips

Reviews & Ratings for
Pardon Us More at IMDbPro »

Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Page 1 of 2:[1] [2] [Next]
Index 20 reviews in total 

12 out of 13 people found the following review useful:

Stan and Ollie Go to Jail. There's Big Laughs at the Big House!

9/10
Author: (robocoptng986127@aol.com) from U.S.A
1 June 2005

It's the midst of the Great Depression as well as Prohibition. Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy have decided to brew their own stuff, and what they can't drink, they'll sell. Well, they made the mistake of selling some beer to two undercover cops and the boys are incarcerated. They're taken to a brutal and unfriendly prison. They are taken before the warden who speaks nicely to them. But then Stan's loose tooth, which makes a buzzing noise whenever he speaks goes off. The warden is insulted and has them sent to their cell at once. The boys soon meet their new cell mate, evil, wild-eyed The Tiger. The next day at the prison school, Tiger gets Stan and Ollie in real hot water with the teacher, who wasn't having much success teaching his class when really he didn't know too much himself, so Stan and Ollie are sent to solitary confinement, a.k.a the hole. When they get out some time later, The Tiger and his men were plotting a jail break and were going to use two flunkies to lead the way. Ollie and Stan were selected. The jail break was aborted by the guards just in time, however Stan and Ollie had successfully escaped. They hid out in a cotton field a few miles from the prison. There, they put on blackface and disguised themselves as migrant workers. They fit right in.

That evening, Ollie serenades the gang with "Lazy Moon" while Stan dances. The next day, Stan and Ollie were working in the cotton fields when who should drive by but the warden and his daughter! Their car had broken down outside the fields and Stan and Ollie were eager to help. They were still wearing blackface so the warden didn't recognize them. They practically take the engine apart before they realize the car was out of gas. So when they fix the car, the warden happily thanks them and offers them work, but then Stan's tooth gave them away. The boys are returned to prison and thrown into the hole...Again; Stan is sent to the prison dentist, Dr. Jentyl, to fix his tooth. The dentist accidentally "fixed" Ollie's tooth first, but then he finally finds the right mouth and removes Stan's trouble...Or did he? The warden, meanwhile, received a tip that The Tiger and his large gang were planning a big escape. He put extra guards on duty. That evening in the mess hall, Tiger and his men secretly began passing out hand guns. Stan was passed a semi- automatic-- which he quickly set off. The prisoners scramble and the guards all begin firing. The prisoners fire back. Stan and Ollie were caught in the middle of a war zone.

Tiger and his men overthrow the guards and then go back for Stan and Ollie. Stan kept setting off the semi-automatic to keep them back, but eventually it ran out of ammo, but luckily the state militia came to the rescue; Stan and Ollie were commended for their part in apprehending Tiger and his men and so they were pardoned. The warden wished them luck and any help he could offer and all seemed well, until Stan offered to sell him a case of brew and his tooth buzzed again. The warden angrily chased the boys out of his office.

Well, now. Pardon Us, Laurel and Hardy's first talkie feature! Though they also starred in The Rogue Song of 1930, but they were actually secondary characters and unfortunately no known print of The Rogue Song exists today. But Pardon Us was the first feature in which Laurel and Hardy were headlined, and they played themselves. Also in the cast is Walter Long as the evil, wild-eyed Tiger, James Finlayson as the wacky, no-nonsense schoolteacher, veteran of the silent era Wilfred Lucas plays the yuppie warden, Tiny Sanford is the brutal prison guard and Laurel & Hardy veteran Charlie Hall is the dentist's assistant. This movie is rare today, and includes some material that just wouldn't fly if it were made today, such as the scene where Stan notices an African American cell mate and an Asian cell mate and comments, "Look, Amos and Andy". I don't get that, but I'm sure it's a joke. And when they are fixing the car, wearing blackface, Stan calls Oliver "Sambo". So it's dated. Big deal. It was 1931. That kind of stuff was common back then. Nobody from this film is alive today, unfortunately. But anyway, if you should be lucky to catch this film, see it! It's very good. Very well done. Classic Laurel & Hardy fare! I recommend Pardon Us! It's guilty of sheer comic brilliance in the first degree!

-

Was the above review useful to you?

13 out of 16 people found the following review useful:

The Boys In The Big House

6/10
Author: Spikeopath from United Kingdom
4 March 2008

Being the lads first full length feature it's not surprising that much of it feels like filler, certainly the jokes are not quick fire and the culminating outcome doesn't quite leave the viewer fully satisfied. However it should be noted that Laurel & Hardy's average output is still better than most other duos who would follow in their slipstream, and Pardon Us does have those moments that ooze comedy class. Witness both Stan & Ollie trying to control a machine gun with typical riotous results, enjoy Stanley's tooth problem that becomes a running gag, and of course enjoy Oliver's incredulous looks at the camera. It's solid if unspectacular, but certainly worth a watch now and then, 6/10.

Footnote: Other user comments allude to certain aspects being un PC for the modern age, who cares is what I say, this is after all Laurel & Hardy in the 30s, it worked then and really it still works now, harmless and enjoyable fun.

Was the above review useful to you?

7 out of 7 people found the following review useful:

Plot and structure wise it is light but it produces plenty of memorable and hilarious scenes

Author: bob the moo from United Kingdom
23 October 2005

Laurel and Hardy are shopping for ingredients for their next get rich scheme – making and selling liquor during prohibition. Of course when Laurel sells a bottle of beer to a policeman, there is only ever going to be one outcome and the two finds themselves on the way to the big house. Locked up with a mean spirited collection of fellas, Stan and Oliver take their chance to escape and find themselves wanted men on the run.

Having just watched the very structured "Our Relations" it was noticeable when I stepped back into the much looser Pardon Us. The basic plot is no more than a nail on which to hang a series of comic scenarios and, as such, it works because it is pretty funny for the majority. The story is pretty weak but it does allow for a solid spoof of jail clichés as well as a pretty un-PC but funny scene where the boys try to pass themselves off as cotton pickers. Despite not having this flow to it, the film does have a couple of good stand out scenes that will please everyone with their typical silliness and mix of looks and double-takes.

Laurel and Hardy are both on form and are served to their strengths well. Finlayson is wonderful in a great classroom scene and he got the biggest laughs from me with a master class in slow burns and double takes. Long is enjoyably tough as The Tiger while Lucas is a good warden. The support cast are roundly good even if they are mainly there to carry the scenes rather than the comedy. The musical numbers are obvious but still good – with Hardy getting a good chance to show off his baritone talents.

Overall a thinly plotted affair but one that delivers quite a few memorable and hilarious scenes, connected with generally amusing moments.

Was the above review useful to you?

6 out of 7 people found the following review useful:

Comedy On The Lam

10/10
Author: Ron Oliver (revilorest@juno.com) from Forest Ranch, CA
21 June 2003

In & out of prison, Stan & Ollie just can't seem to stay out of trouble.

"PARDON US" was the Boys' first starring feature film. Rather disjointed and poorly edited, it plays more like a few of their short subjects strung together. However, the Boys never falter and they deliver a film whose parts are greater than its whole.

The film was meant to be a spoof of MGM's popular THE BIG HOUSE (1930) and it helps to have seen that earlier movie to fully appreciate this one. Many of the standard conventions of the typical prison film are mocked here: the ‘understanding' warden, the dangerous convict cell mate, the confinement in Solitary, the escape chased by bloodhounds, the prison riot.

A few comedy pieces in particular stand out: Stan's loose tooth; Ollie in the dentist's chair; the Boys trying to settle into the constricted confines of an upper bunk. James Finlayson, Stan & Ollie's old nemesis, makes the most of his one scene as the prison schoolteacher driven to despair by the Boys' good-natured idiocy.

Walter Long is lots of fun as the Tiger, the meanest convict in the prison (Boris Karloff played the part for the French language version). Movie mavens will spot an uncredited Charlie Hall as the dental assistant.

An added delight is Babe Hardy's rendition of ‘Lazy Moon,' one of the decade's finest film songs. Ollie had a warm, evocative voice, full of feeling and emotion. Here, backed by the magnificent Hall Johnson Choir, his song reaches out of the screen and down the decades to touch the hearts of the audience.

Was the above review useful to you?

11 out of 17 people found the following review useful:

"They'll never recognise us in a hundred years!"

6/10
Author: The_Movie_Cat from England
5 February 2001

So says Ollie at the start of a sustained eleven-minute sequence where he and Stan paint their hands and faces to hide amongst a black community. On two occasions the paint gets washed off and has to be replaced; Stan with dirt from a puddle, Ollie with oil. Like the stereotypical black people that occupy the piece, it's one of those "would never be allowed nowadays" moments that marks Pardon Us out as an unusual curio. The boundaries between innocence and unintentional risk-taking occur throughout. Set largely in a prison, there's a later scene where Stan is threatened by a knife, and an inmate is shown to be a potential rapist when coming face to face with the warden's daughter. Although Stan's sharing a bed with Hardy and the same inmate promising that he and Stan will be "great pals" is played without any form of sexual connotation.

This sort of politically incorrect humour is not only common to Pardon Us, however. In the following year's Pack Up Your Troubles the duo would pretend to have only one arm in order to escape being drafted into the army. Stan would pour boiling hot water over three men, while the two would steal $2000 from a bank. The 1932 film would also tackle the theme of wife battery and feature another race joke, which takes us back to Pardon us. In a curious scene, Stan mistakes two prisoners – one black, one Asian – as the radio "blackface" double-act, Amos and Andy. It's impossible to condemn the film on such matters, and I wouldn't even try, as that sort of thing was commonplace for the time it was made. But it's notable, and slightly alarming, even so. Whoever would have thought such naive humour still had the ability to shock seventy years on?

Laurel and Hardy perhaps never had wide ambitions, though did some pretty groundbreaking stuff in terms of stunts and special effects. More intelligent than The Three Stooges, they nevertheless didn't aspire to the same terms of art and film as, say, Chaplin. But while they may not be as admired as Charlie, Keaton or even Lloyd, they are doubtless more loved. Even though most of the jokes are clearly set-up, their assured execution, by Laurel, particularly, means they never fall flat. It must be said that the interplay between the two stars isn't as good as it would be, and that as their first full-length talkie, the pace is notably slower than what was to follow. The age of the silent movie is still felt throughout, with a lone damsel in distress in a burning building, and some overstated body language from the bit players. The film opens with a caption, and incidental music is almost omnipresent – both now redundant, and slightly distracting. Though while the rapport between the two would be stronger - only their 24th talkie, they would appear in another 52 together after this - Pardon Us is still a fine example of their work. Stan's gormless, inane smile, dopey eyes and sticky ears are a delight, while his mastery of physical comedy is exceptional. Those who wish to build an argument that Stan was the talented one will be served here by a Hardy who gets to be second fiddle all the way, and is encouraged to double-take to camera a few too many times.

Lastly, two points come to mind. One is a dentist calling Stan "Rosebud" – was Orson Welles inspired? And Ollie here says "another nice mess", not the oft-quoted "fine".

Was the above review useful to you?

3 out of 4 people found the following review useful:

not exactly perfect and too many lulls, but wow what fun!

7/10
Author: planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida
21 February 2006

This was Laurel and Hardy's first full-length movie, though it is admittedly a short full-length film. And, apart from a few somewhat slow moments (particularly in the very politically incorrect and portion where the team pose as Black sharecroppers) as well as a running gag that isn't funny (the tooth), it is great fun overall. Part of the reason it is so much fun is that their foil is Walter Long--one of the absolutely scariest looking bad guys in movie history! I loved him in this movie and he is just terrifying. Well, the boys being very stupid, find a way to get on Long's bad side and they know their days are numbered unless some miracle happens--and that's exactly what happens at the film's conclusion. I won't give away the details because I don't want to spoil the fun, but this is a wonderful little film--minus all the songs that seemed to be added as padding.

Was the above review useful to you?

4 out of 6 people found the following review useful:

Their first full-length feature is one to remember!

9/10
Author: Boba_Fett1138 from Groningen, The Netherlands
15 February 2006

This was the first full-length movie from Laurel & Hardy, that last over 1 hour long. Their first effort is definitely one of their better ones.

Difference with most other Laurel & Hardy movies is that this one actually has a story and continuity in it. It's more than just one slapstick and comical moment after another and it's obvious that they definitely put lots of effort in the story. The movie is constantly funny although the movie could had done without those musical numbers in my opinion. It's extremely old fashioned and takes the pace right out of the movie.

Besides the two boys the movie also has some other memorable characters in it such as Wilfred Lucas as the jail warden, James Finlayson as the jail schoolteacher and Walter Long as fellow prisoner The Tiger. Especially Walter Long stands out in his role and he plays an extremely fun character who of course gives the two an hard time.

The movie is very fine constructed and build up to the memorable ending in which one big jail break is attempted. It's pretty violent stuff for Laurel & Hardy standards and I had never thought that I would ever see the two of them holding a gun. The ending is almost action movie like but it of course is also extremely hilarious at the same time.

There are quite some returning running gags in the movie that all help to make this movie a very memorable one. Also enough slapstick humor is present so fans of that will also be delighted with this movie.

9/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

Was the above review useful to you?

5 out of 8 people found the following review useful:

Laurel's and Hardy's first full length

Author: Petri Pelkonen (petri_pelkonen@hotmail.com) from Finland
1 February 2000

In Laurel's and Hardy's first full length talking picture the boys go behind bars.And Stan's loose tooth gets the boys in trouble many times, when it starts making a funny noise every time he speaks.Pardon Us offers you many funny moments with Laurel and Hardy.

Was the above review useful to you?

1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:

Laurel and Hardy's First Full-Length Feature

Author: Matt Barry from Baltimore, Maryland
28 October 2000

PARDON US, filmed in 1930 then edited down and released in 1931, is Laurel and Hardy's first feature-length comedy. In it, they are set to jail after Stan sells some illegal brew to a policeman ("Well, I couldn't help it-I thought he was a streetcar conductor!"). The whole film is pretty funny. There isn't much story, but a series of funny things that happen to the boys in jail. The finale has Stan and Ollie foiling a jailbreak. Highlights of the film include a great "welcoming" scene with extremely tolerant warden Wilfred Lucas, Laurel and Hardy posing as African American sharecroppers (with Stan shoving entire plants of cotton into his bag while Hardy daintily picks each piece of cotton with care), and a hilarious schoolroom scene with teacher James Finlayson! Not up to the standard of SONS OF THE DESERT or WAY OUT WEST, but still very funny. Try and get the complete 65-minute version that was on video in the early 1980s.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

Mediocre L&H comedy

Author: JoeytheBrit from www.moviemoviesite.com
22 March 2010

This was Laurel & Hardy's first feature-length film, and it's clear they're not too comfortable with the format: too much padding, not enough laughs. They play a couple of would-be beer barons who find themselves in the slammer after trying to sell beer to a cop, and they look like veritable lambs to the slaughter as they fall foul of Walter Long, the evil-eyed Tiger. The best thing about this film – apart from the boys themselves, who rise effortlessly above their rather mediocre material – is the great array of weather-beaten punch-drunk faces of the character actors chosen to flesh out the parts of the other inmates. They all look like they spend most of their time loitering in dark alleyways waiting for some poor soul to come wandering past.

There's a lot of content that would be considered politically incorrect in these wonderfully enlightened times, and for once the film would probably be no worse off if it wasn't there. There are a few laugh-out-loud moments, but for the most part this one falls far short of the boy's usual high standard. The editing, in particular, is shockingly bad – even for 1931.

Was the above review useful to you?


Page 1 of 2:[1] [2] [Next]

Add another review


Related Links

Plot summary Ratings External reviews
Plot keywords Main details Your user reviews
Your vote history