12 out of 14 people found the following comment useful :- Not a great film by any stretch of the imagination, but I still kind of liked it, 27 October 2006
Author:
planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida
This film isn't particularly outstanding in so many ways. Some of the
acting and plot elements were rather pedestrian (at best) and the plot
is very hard to believe, but despite all this I actually enjoyed the
film more than my score of 6 might indicate. That's because this is a
"Pre-Code" film (actually, this term should be "Early-Code") and I find
these films VERY entertaining relics from our past. The Hays Office was
created in the 1920s to enforce morality and decency in the film
industry, but it was still in its early days and studios routinely
ignored it until the stronger "Production Code" was adopted in 1935. Up
until then, films were often amazingly risqué and adult--even by
today's standards. A few examples of the things that led to the Hays
Office being created and strengthened were:
--The 1920s version of BEN HUR, in which there was quite a bit of
nudity and violence--and this was a Biblical Epic!
--The film PARACHUTE JUMPER includes a scene where Frank McHugh is
hitchhiking. When a car passes without stopping, his thumb instantly
becomes a middle-finger!
--In BIRD OF PARADISE, TARZAN THE APE MAN and THE BARBARIAN, there were
some very explicit bathing scenes in which you see a lot of Delores Del
Rio, Maureen O'Sullivan and Myrna Loy!
While THE LADY REFUSES doesn't include nudity, it is definitely a
"Pre-Code"-style film because of the very adult themes. The leading
lady (Betty Compson) plays a prostitute "with a heart of gold" who is
hired by a man to seduce away his son from a "gold-digger"! And, later
both the son AND father fall for this prostitute and want to marry her!
Oddly, however, the words 'prostitute', 'hooker' nor any of the other
slang terms for the profession are used in the film--though it's very
clear that this is Ms. Compson's job. In addition to this adult aspect
of the film, the son twice spends the night in Ms. Compson's bed and
everyone in the film THINKS that they were fornicating (though they
weren't). Such innuendo NEVER would have been tolerated just a few
years later.
Now despite all these sleazy elements, the movie itself is pretty
entertaining and well-made--and definitely kept my interest. Ms.
Compson was a dandy actress in the film and it's sad her career as a
talking picture leading lady slowly fizzled. As for John Darrow and
Gilbert Emery, they both were pretty poor at times--having some trouble
with their lines and occasionally over or under-acting. It wasn't bad
enough to severely hinder the film, but it was noticeable if you were
paying close attention.
The bottom line is that for fans of the "Pre-Code" films or film buffs,
this is a MUST-SEE film. For most others, it's a time-passer or
eminently one you can skip.
10 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :- Focus lacking in early talkie., 27 September 2001
Author:
rsoonsa (rsoonsa@bandbbooks.com) from Mountain Mesa, California
Gilbert Emery, as a patrician English peer, Sir Gerald Courtney, dominates
this film as he tries to bring his rakehell son Russell (John Darrow)
closer
to him through a secret strategem involving June (Betty Compson), an
economically distressed young woman. To regain Russell's affection, Sir
Gerald offers June, whom he has rescued from incipient prostitution, one
thousand pounds in this London-based work, for her efforts in dissuading
his
wayward son from an alliance with a golddigger played by Margaret
Livingston. Compson, an accomplished actress during the silent era, does
her best to portray a worldly woman given an unexpected beneficence by
fate,
but she is hampered by a script which is clumsily written with a good deal
of dialogue bordering upon gaucherie. After escaping from a pair of
zealous
bobbies, with assistance from Sir Gerald, June is established by him into
an
apartment building shared with the unwitting Russell, and is graced as well
with a lavish wardrobe at a couturiere's, this latter being probably the
picture's most defined moment. June's good works for the salving of
Russell
are dealt with in some detail, and are obviously largely appreciated by Sir
Gerald, but her relationships with both father and son are skimpily
sketched
and emotional liaisons appear to be rather abruptly developed and severed.
Veteran director George Archainbaud seems to have scant vision for whatever
niceties the weak scenario might bring, and his handling of the cast and
storyline are perfunctory with too many scenes marked by absence of sense;
fortunately, the editing is very efficient. Although this affair begins
and
ends with a tendency towards placing atmosphere above plot, the last
unfortunately mars the work; some fine acting turns are somewhat
redemptive,
particularly those by the always polished Emery and by Halliwell Hobbes as
the Courtney family barrister.
6 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :- Early talkie has its moments, but not enough, 3 December 2001
Author:
signinstranger from Sacramento, CA
Talky early talkie can't rise above its theatrical roots. Betty Compson is
far too old (36 when this movie was released) and American to pass herself
off as a Londoner fallen on bad times who can be hired to seduce rakehell
John Darrow (who seems to know better than to attempt an English accent).
Gilbert Emery is best in a stiff-upper-lip performance enhanced by his
remarkable vocal and physical similarity to Stephen Fry. But this tale of a
woman saved from the London streets so she can save the son from making the
wrong choice is marred by blurry details, as if most of the story has taken
place out of frame. What story remains moves slowly, and holds tight to its
stereotypes of upper classes, comic butlers, loose women, and sneering
foreigners. For devotees of early talkies only.
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- The independent woman before she was silenced, 29 November 2006
Author:
ScenicRoute from New York - Seattle
I agree with the other reviewers: This isn't a great movie because it
is too stage bound, the plot is far-fetched, the London setting
unconvincing (why not New York?), and some of the acting is wooden or
uneven. However, John Darrow is convincing as a talented young man a
little too enslaved by his passions, and he is sexually alive and
compelling. Betty Compson is great - hers is the performance that make
this and so many other pre-Production Code movies worthwhile. She has
no shame about who she is (nor has Margaret Livingston, who appears to
have stepped out of Valley of the Dolls), and her last speech earns the
movie a 7 in my book. She is completely liberated, though she knows how
to and does pay lip-service to conventional morality. It is this
combination, the lip-service combined with the complete independence,
that makes this pre-Production Code movie (among many) so radical. Her
final scene eloquently gives the lie to conventional morality and left
me agape. No need for the 1960s-lib genre with movies like this.
Own the rights?
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
The Lady Refuses (1931) More at IMDbPro »
12 out of 14 people found the following comment useful :-

Not a great film by any stretch of the imagination, but I still kind of liked it, 27 October 2006
Author: planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida
This film isn't particularly outstanding in so many ways. Some of the acting and plot elements were rather pedestrian (at best) and the plot is very hard to believe, but despite all this I actually enjoyed the film more than my score of 6 might indicate. That's because this is a "Pre-Code" film (actually, this term should be "Early-Code") and I find these films VERY entertaining relics from our past. The Hays Office was created in the 1920s to enforce morality and decency in the film industry, but it was still in its early days and studios routinely ignored it until the stronger "Production Code" was adopted in 1935. Up until then, films were often amazingly risqué and adult--even by today's standards. A few examples of the things that led to the Hays Office being created and strengthened were:
--The 1920s version of BEN HUR, in which there was quite a bit of nudity and violence--and this was a Biblical Epic!
--The film PARACHUTE JUMPER includes a scene where Frank McHugh is hitchhiking. When a car passes without stopping, his thumb instantly becomes a middle-finger!
--In BIRD OF PARADISE, TARZAN THE APE MAN and THE BARBARIAN, there were some very explicit bathing scenes in which you see a lot of Delores Del Rio, Maureen O'Sullivan and Myrna Loy!
While THE LADY REFUSES doesn't include nudity, it is definitely a "Pre-Code"-style film because of the very adult themes. The leading lady (Betty Compson) plays a prostitute "with a heart of gold" who is hired by a man to seduce away his son from a "gold-digger"! And, later both the son AND father fall for this prostitute and want to marry her! Oddly, however, the words 'prostitute', 'hooker' nor any of the other slang terms for the profession are used in the film--though it's very clear that this is Ms. Compson's job. In addition to this adult aspect of the film, the son twice spends the night in Ms. Compson's bed and everyone in the film THINKS that they were fornicating (though they weren't). Such innuendo NEVER would have been tolerated just a few years later.
Now despite all these sleazy elements, the movie itself is pretty entertaining and well-made--and definitely kept my interest. Ms. Compson was a dandy actress in the film and it's sad her career as a talking picture leading lady slowly fizzled. As for John Darrow and Gilbert Emery, they both were pretty poor at times--having some trouble with their lines and occasionally over or under-acting. It wasn't bad enough to severely hinder the film, but it was noticeable if you were paying close attention.
The bottom line is that for fans of the "Pre-Code" films or film buffs, this is a MUST-SEE film. For most others, it's a time-passer or eminently one you can skip.
10 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :-

Focus lacking in early talkie., 27 September 2001
Author: rsoonsa (rsoonsa@bandbbooks.com) from Mountain Mesa, California
Gilbert Emery, as a patrician English peer, Sir Gerald Courtney, dominates this film as he tries to bring his rakehell son Russell (John Darrow) closer to him through a secret strategem involving June (Betty Compson), an economically distressed young woman. To regain Russell's affection, Sir Gerald offers June, whom he has rescued from incipient prostitution, one thousand pounds in this London-based work, for her efforts in dissuading his wayward son from an alliance with a golddigger played by Margaret Livingston. Compson, an accomplished actress during the silent era, does her best to portray a worldly woman given an unexpected beneficence by fate, but she is hampered by a script which is clumsily written with a good deal of dialogue bordering upon gaucherie. After escaping from a pair of zealous bobbies, with assistance from Sir Gerald, June is established by him into an apartment building shared with the unwitting Russell, and is graced as well with a lavish wardrobe at a couturiere's, this latter being probably the picture's most defined moment. June's good works for the salving of Russell are dealt with in some detail, and are obviously largely appreciated by Sir Gerald, but her relationships with both father and son are skimpily sketched and emotional liaisons appear to be rather abruptly developed and severed. Veteran director George Archainbaud seems to have scant vision for whatever niceties the weak scenario might bring, and his handling of the cast and storyline are perfunctory with too many scenes marked by absence of sense; fortunately, the editing is very efficient. Although this affair begins and ends with a tendency towards placing atmosphere above plot, the last unfortunately mars the work; some fine acting turns are somewhat redemptive, particularly those by the always polished Emery and by Halliwell Hobbes as the Courtney family barrister.
6 out of 9 people found the following comment useful :-

Early talkie has its moments, but not enough, 3 December 2001
Author: signinstranger from Sacramento, CA
Talky early talkie can't rise above its theatrical roots. Betty Compson is far too old (36 when this movie was released) and American to pass herself off as a Londoner fallen on bad times who can be hired to seduce rakehell John Darrow (who seems to know better than to attempt an English accent). Gilbert Emery is best in a stiff-upper-lip performance enhanced by his remarkable vocal and physical similarity to Stephen Fry. But this tale of a woman saved from the London streets so she can save the son from making the wrong choice is marred by blurry details, as if most of the story has taken place out of frame. What story remains moves slowly, and holds tight to its stereotypes of upper classes, comic butlers, loose women, and sneering foreigners. For devotees of early talkies only.
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-

The independent woman before she was silenced, 29 November 2006
Author: ScenicRoute from New York - Seattle
I agree with the other reviewers: This isn't a great movie because it is too stage bound, the plot is far-fetched, the London setting unconvincing (why not New York?), and some of the acting is wooden or uneven. However, John Darrow is convincing as a talented young man a little too enslaved by his passions, and he is sexually alive and compelling. Betty Compson is great - hers is the performance that make this and so many other pre-Production Code movies worthwhile. She has no shame about who she is (nor has Margaret Livingston, who appears to have stepped out of Valley of the Dolls), and her last speech earns the movie a 7 in my book. She is completely liberated, though she knows how to and does pay lip-service to conventional morality. It is this combination, the lip-service combined with the complete independence, that makes this pre-Production Code movie (among many) so radical. Her final scene eloquently gives the lie to conventional morality and left me agape. No need for the 1960s-lib genre with movies like this.
Add another comment
Related Links