Drácula (1931)

Director:

George Melford

Writers:

Bram Stoker (novel)
Baltasar Fernández Cué (Spanish adaptation)

Genre:

Drama | Fantasy | Horror

Plot:

At midnight on Walpurgis Night, an English clerk, Renfield, arrives at Count Dracula's castle in the Carpathian Mountains...

Plot Keywords:

Dracula | Count | Doctor | Abbey | Castle

Awards:

1 nomination

Cast

Carlos Villarías	...	Conde Drácula (as Carlos Villar)
Lupita Tovar	...	Eva Seward
Barry Norton	...	Juan Harker
Pablo Álvarez Rubio	...	Renfield
Eduardo Arozamena	...	Prof. Van Helsing
José Soriano Viosca	...	Doctor Seward
Carmen Guerrero	...	Lucía Weston
Amelia Senisterra	...	Marta
Manuel Arbó	...	Martín

Also Known As:

Dracula, Spanish Version (USA) (DVD box title)
Spanish Dracula (USA) (working title)

Runtime:

104 min

Country:

USA

Language:

Spanish | Hungarian

Color:

Black and White

Aspect Ratio:

1.20 : 1

Sound Mix:

Mono (Western Electric System)

Certification:

Finland:K-11 (2004) | Spain:13 | Canada:G (Quebec) | USA:Unrated | Sweden:7

Filming Locations:

Universal Studios - 100 Universal City Plaza, Universal City, California, USA

Company:

Universal Pictures

Trivia:

Although this version was shot in Spanish, it became a mixture of dialects since the cast came from Mexico, Spain, Central and South America.

Goofs:

Factual errors: "Carlos Villarías" is misspelled in the opening credits as "Carlos Villar".

Quotes:

Eva: [English subtitle] The next morning, I felt very weak as if I had lost my virginity.

Movie Connections:

Featured in Bloodsucking Cinema (2007) (TV)

What's all the ruido about....

If my facts are straight, this much touted Spanish version of "Dracula" was considered lost for many years until its rediscovery in the 1970s upon which many a critic and film historian flocked to view this rare "gem" & seemingly all at once proclaimed it better than its more famous English cousin.

Perhaps the novelty of finding this similar, but in many aspects different alternate take on the Tod Browning classic led to such clamoring, though given the many years in which viewers have been accustomed to videotape & now DVD--in which a back-to-back comparison of the two films is a very simple exercise--the fawning many do over Melford's 'Drac' seems a bit in the extreme, particularly such critical observations of how Melford upstages the English film "scene by scene, shot by shot". Having recently viewed both films, it's my opinion that a shot-for-shot comparison doesn't prove very detrimental at all to Señor Browning.

For instance, the much raved about moving camera of George Robinson doesn't really show much more mobility than Karl Freund's. Yes, there is the shot of the camera roving up the stairs in Drac's castle, but aside from that & a few other minor instances, Melford & Robinson keep the camera as still as the oft-derided Browning. Btw, I found it more than a bit amusing that the critters Browning has roaming around the cellars of Dracula's castle--the opossum and bug escaping from a miniature coffin--were retained by Melford.

The really big difference in movies is seeing the different angles which Melford shot many of his scenes from & how he makes more use of the outside portico in many of the later drawing room scenes. For those of us familiar with the Lugosi film, this can make for an interesting visual variety, but does this really equate to "better" or "masterful" directing?

It's not my intention to slam this version of Dracula. I think any horror fan should give it a few looks to see how two different production teams can interpret a single script & put their own creative twists on it. From that standpoint, the Spanish "Dracula" is required viewing, but hardly the "scathing critique" of its English counterpart that many have proclaimed it to be.