MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 10,277 this week

Lovin' the Ladies (1930)

 -  Comedy | Romance  -  6 April 1930 (USA)
6.4
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.4/10 from 91 users  
Reviews: 4 user | 1 critic

Jimmy Farnsworth (Allen Kearns) bets his friend $5,000 that he can get any two people, under the proper environment, to fall in love and become engaged within a month.

Director:

(as Melville Brown)

Writers:

(based on the play: "I Love You"), (adapted for the screen by)
0Check in
0Share...

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb at Comic-Con 2014

Follow our coverage of Comic-Con 2014, direct from San Diego July 23-27 in our Comic-Con section.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

list image
a list of 1473 titles
created 10 Jul 2013
 
a list of 222 titles
created 6 months ago
 

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Lovin' the Ladies (1930)

Lovin' the Ladies (1930) on IMDb 6.4/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Lovin' the Ladies.

Videos

1 video »
Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
...
Peter Darby
...
Joan Bently
Allen Kearns ...
Jimmy Farnsworth
Rita La Roy ...
Louise Endicott (as Rita LaRoy)
Anthony Bushell ...
Brooks - the Butler
Renée Macready ...
Betty Duncan
Virginia Sale ...
Marie - Joan's Maid
Henry Armetta ...
Signore Sagatelli
Ernest Hilliard ...
Davison - Tailor Shop Owner
Selmer Jackson ...
George Van Horne
Edit

Storyline

Jimmy Farnsworth (Allen Kearns) bets his friend $5,000 that he can get any two people, under the proper environment, to fall in love and become engaged within a month.

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Comedy | Romance

Certificate:

Approved | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

6 April 1930 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

The Roughneck Lover  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

(Turner library print)

Sound Mix:

(RCA Photophone System)

Aspect Ratio:

1.20 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The play, "I Love You," opened on Broadway in New York City, New York, USA on 28 April 1919 and had 56 performances. The opening night cast included Richard Dix, Robert Strange and Ruth Terry. Dix played the role of the electrician in the stage version as well. Review: New York Tribune, April 29, 1919, page 13. See more »

Soundtracks

You're Always in My Arms
(1929) (uncredited)
Music by Harry Tierney
Performed by Henry Armetta on the violin
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Mildly enjoyable timepiece -- despite being made in 1930, it lacks a lot of pre-codey goodiness
15 August 2006 | by (my sofa) – See all my reviews

With a title like "Lovin' the Ladies" and it being made in 1930, and there being a tremendous dearth of pre-codes lately on TCM ... well, I was hoping for some juicy pre-Production Code entertainment, but alas that was not the case with this flick. Nonetheless, at less than 75 minutes, it was face-paced and mildly amusing enough. As with a lot of these really old movies, I found I enjoyed it for the cultural references and peak into the past.

The phrase "make love" was used a lot ... it seems to have *not* meant what we mean by that phrase today. In 1930, that phrase seemed to mean something more along the lines of "pitch woo". At any rate, it was quite funny to hear Richard Dix tell the group of socialites that Jimmy was going to pay him $2,500 to make love to Betty!

A reference was made to "Decoration Day", which from the context I took to mean some sort of patriotic and/or veteran-related holiday, perhaps a precursor to Memorial Day?

The acting was fairly wooden and stagy ... typical of early sound flicks, so having seen many early sounds, I wasn't too bothered by it, but it would definitely be annoying to modern audiences not used to that transitional style of "acting". Richard Dix did quite well with his role. I haven't seen him in a lot of flicks, but my impression is that westerns were more his forte. If so, this movie demonstrated that he could handle light comedy fairly well.

Dix plays an electrician who is talked into pretending to be a society gentleman by Jimmy, a rich ne'er-do-well who makes a bet with his buddy that he can make any two people fall in love given the right circumstances. His buddy, George, selects electrician Peter and snooty rich girl Betty as the two subjects. Predictable plot ensues, where Peter is more interested in Joan (Jimmy's fiancé), Joan is interested in Peter, Betty is interested in Brooks the butler (and Brooks seems to return Betty's interest), and yet a third woman, Louise, is at one point so overcome with lust that she practically ravages a very unwilling and uncomfortable Peter.

The plot was amusing and predictable, and although somewhat racy, not really racy enough to qualify as a genuine "pre-Code" despite its 1930 date.

There were a couple of amusing lines that made me laugh out loud. The premise behind them both is that Peter and Brooks, the working class guys, were more highly educated and knowledgeable than the buffoon "swells" whom they work for. Here's the two lines:

1 - George to Jimmy, "Do you mean to say your butler knows more than you or I do?". Jimmy's reply, "Don't be silly, George. He knows *twice* as much as I do, and a million times more than you do!"

2 - Brooks to Peter, upon seeing Peter for the first time in his fancy clothes, "Why Peter, if I didn't know you were an intelligent man, I'd certainly think you were a gentleman!" (the word 'gentleman' being a derogatory term in this context)

Another interesting timepiece thing: The movie used a couple of silent era-style intertitles to set the scene, for example, "The following morning." From a historical standpoint, it was slightly interesting to me to see this device borrowed by the infant sound picture from its well-established but firmly though recently departed ancestor, the silent film.

Richard Dix fairly acquitted himself. I enjoyed seeing Anthony Bushell (whom I remember fondly from one of my favorite pre-Codes, Five Star Final) as the butler. The other actors and actresses were just so-so ... ranging from occasionally good (the actor who played Jimmy) to downright dreadful (the actress who played Betty).

I wouldn't go out of my way to watch this if I were you, but if you have an interest in old movies from a cultural or historical standpoint, this movie does have a modicum to offer in that area.


11 of 14 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
aspects of Richard Dix skiddoo
Discuss Lovin' the Ladies (1930) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?