Up 14,115 this week

Welcome Danger (1929)

Passed  -  Comedy  -  12 October 1929 (USA)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.2/10 from 411 users  
Reviews: 24 user | 8 critic

Harold Bledsoe, a botany student, is called back home to San Francisco, where his late father had been police chief, to help investigate a crime wave in Chinatown.


, (uncredited)


(dialogue), (story), 3 more credits »
0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 3309 titles
created 18 Oct 2011
a list of 40 titles
created 01 Jun 2012
a list of 102 titles
created 10 Aug 2012
a list of 2372 titles
created 4 months ago
a list of 23 titles
created 2 months ago

Search for "Welcome Danger" on

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Welcome Danger (1929)

Welcome Danger (1929) on IMDb 6.2/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Welcome Danger.


Complete credited cast:
Harold Bledsoe
Barbara Kent ...
Billie Lee
Noah Young ...
Patrick Clancy
John Thorne (as Chas. Middleton)
Will Walling ...
Capt. Walton (as William Walling)
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Grady Sutton ...
Man at Party (silent version) (scenes deleted)


Harold Bledsoe, a botany student, is called back home to San Francisco, where his late father had been police chief, to help investigate a crime wave in Chinatown. Written by Herman Seifer <>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


For the First Time! Hear Harold Lloyd Talk




Passed | See all certifications »




Release Date:

12 October 1929 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Welcome Danger  »

Box Office


$979,828 (estimated)

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

(Western Electric System)

Aspect Ratio:

1.20 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


Began shooting as a silent in August, 1928 at Metropolitan Studios, it would become an agonizingly long and complicated production. It was finally released on October 12, 1929 as a talkie after largely being re-shot with another director (Clyde Bruckman) as a talkie (marking the first time Lloyd worked from a script) and painstakingly edited down from an original 16-reels (some 2 hours and forty-five minutes) to 12-reels. The silent version cost $521,000 and another $281,000 was spent on the sound negative. While the novelty of hearing Lloyd speak made it his largest grossing hit since _Freshman, The (1925)_, those steep production costs resulted in a huge drop in net profits from his earlier features. See more »


In many of the dubbed scenes, the voices are out of synchronization with the actors' lip movements. See more »


Featured in American Masters: Harold Lloyd: The Third Genius (1989) See more »


When You Are Mine
Written by Paul Titsworth and Lynn Cowan
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

13 November 2001 | by (New York, NY) – See all my reviews

This film was started as a silent and finished as a sound film. One would expect, then, to see some classic Lloyd "silent" comedy sequences, but this is a very disappointing and largely unfunny film. Lloyd's hallmark was always fresh, original, well-worked-out visual gags, but the poorly timed shenanigans here often remind one of something below the Three Stooges: the Bowery Boys, maybe. In virtually every other Lloyd film, regardless of whether he was shy, cocky, a success or a bumbler, his character was always inventive, thinking up ingenious solutions to the problems he found himself in. In this film, much of the humor is based on his simple stupidity. There are endless really primitive early action gags: one character gets the bad guys to chase him while the another stands behind a large crate and bats them on the head as they go by; a character takes a swing with a club to hit someone in front of him and accidentally hits someone creeping up behind him; a friend puts his hand on Lloyd's shoulder so he won't get lost in the dark, but when Lloyd gets back into the light the hand on his shoulder is that of a foe. These and other familiar lightweight gags abound, and the Lloyd's imaginative building of original gags is nowhere to be seen. In addition, nearly identical weak gags are sometimes repeated several times in a row. The bumbling around in a chinatown basement just seems interminable.

What happened? Lloyd's films before and after this one are all classics of top-notch comedy. This is a lapse that's unique in Lloyd's career.

10 of 12 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
.... basement scene.... ksf-2
much historical interest skiddoo
Discuss Welcome Danger (1929) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: