MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 40,857 this week

Redskin (1929)

6.9
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.9/10 from 106 users  
Reviews: 6 user | 4 critic

Add a Plot

Writers:

(titles), (screenplay), 1 more credit »
0Check in
0Share...

On Disc

at Amazon

Editors' Spotlight

Fall TV Premiere Week

Many of your favorite shows are coming back, along with plenty of series premieres. Here's a list of the shows premiering between Sunday, September 21 and Friday, September 26.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 300 titles
created 27 Dec 2010
 
a list of 224 titles
created 27 Sep 2012
 
list image
a list of 29 titles
created 01 Feb 2013
 
list image
a list of 248 titles
created 10 months ago
 
a list of 50 titles
created 3 months ago
 

Related Items

Search for "Redskin" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Redskin (1929)

Redskin (1929) on IMDb 6.9/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Redskin.
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
...
Wing Foot
Julie Carter ...
Corn Blossom (as Gladys Belmont)
Tully Marshall ...
Navajo Jim
George Regas ...
Notani (as George Rigas)
Noble Johnson ...
Pueblo Jim
Jane Novak ...
Judith Stearns
Larry Steers ...
John Walton
Augustina López ...
Grandmother Yina (as Augustina Lopez)
Bernard Siegel ...
Chahi - the medicine man
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Jack Padjan ...
Barrett (as Jack Duane)
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis


Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

23 February 1929 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Rothaut  »

Box Office

Budget:

$472,000 (estimated)
 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

| (2-strip Technicolor)

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Shown in Magnoscope process during its initial release. See more »

Connections

Referenced in Ratskin (1929) See more »

Soundtracks

Redskin
(uncredited)
Music by J.S. Zamecnik
Sung during the opening credits by an unidentified female singer
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Excellent but woefully neglected film
6 July 2000 | by See all my reviews

It's always a tragedy when a potentially important motion picture is lost and, therefore, can no longer be seen. An even worse tragedy is when an important film DOES survive, and yet is rarely shown. Such is the case of REDSKIN, a superb drama from the late silent era that currently exists in the film archives of the Library of Congress.

The title of the film is not meant to be degrading to American Indian. It refers to the film's hero, Wing Foot (Richard Dix), who is a Navaho educated at the school of white man. In the course of the story he experiences prejudice from both the whites (because of his race) and the Navahos (who disown him because of his upbringing. Thus, Wing Foot is looked upon as neither Indian nor white, but simply a "redskin."

I've only seen this film twice: The first more than ten years ago at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and the second in 1999 at UCLA. Other than these extremely rare screenings, REDSKIN seems to have been giving very little exposure to contemporary audiences. To my knowledge, it has never been shown on television, even in this age of cable and satellite channels. Nor has it been made available on videocassette, laser disc, or DVD.

What a tragedy! REDSKIN is an excellent film in many ways - from its production values, to its well-written story, to the effective performance by Richard Dix, the film's talented and now woefully neglected star.

What impressed me when I saw it the first time - an impression reinforced by the second time - was that here was a film that dealt sympathetically with the American Indians in an era of filmmaking that far too many people THINK was one where Indians were shown as murderous savages.

Not only does REDSKIN avoid this stereotype, but it also sidesteps the more contemporary, "politically correct" stereotype offered in LITTLE BIG MAN and DANCES WITH WOLVES. In those films the Indians are generally depicted as being mainly peaceful and morally right, while the whites (save the main protagonist) are seen as the bloodthirsty savages - greedy bigots with little or no redeeming values. Instead of showing the red man as evil and the white man good - or vice versa - REDSKIN presents good and bad in both. The government agent who beats Wing Foot in the beginning of the picture eventually emerges as a decent man - some one who made a mistake and later regretted it. At the end he redeems himself by aiding Wing Foot in his attempt to register his oil claim.

Want more? REDSKIN presents not only the conflict between whites and Indians, but also BETWEEN the Indian races (Navajos and Pueblos are shown to dislike each other). How many other films do this?

If all this isn't enough, REDSKIN is important for its use of Technicolor photography. Roughly two-thirds of this film used color. Although at the time Technicolor had only a two-strip process which could not register the blue spectrum (skies appear white), the red spectrum was fully present, and quite breathtaking in capturing the ruddy hues of the Arizona locations. Color was used for the scenes taking place on the Indians' land, while black and white was used only in the scenes in the white man's world.

REDSKIN has been praised by the late William K. Everson in his book THE HOLLYWOOD WESTERN, while in THE WAR, THE WEST, AND THE WILDERNESS, author Kevin Brownlow states that it is a film "long overdue for rediscovery."


13 of 15 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Bernard Siegel as Chahi, the medicine man aahronheim
Discuss Redskin (1929) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?