Zvenigora (1928)

Zvenigora stars Nikolai Nademsky (Earth), as the grandfather of Timoshka (Semyon Svashenko), whom he alerts to secret treasure buried in the mountains and the boy spends the rest of his ... See full synopsis »

Director:

Aleksandr Dovzhenko

Writers:

Aleksandr Dovzhenko (supervising writer), Mikhail Ioganson,

Stars:

Georgi Astafyev, Nikolai Nademsky, Vladimir Uralsky

Cast

Cast overview:
Georgi Astafyev	...	Scythian leader (as G. Astafyev)
Nikolai Nademsky	...	Grandpa / General
Vladimir Uralsky	...	Peasant
Les Podorozhnij	...	Pavlo, second grandson
Semyon Svashenko	...	Timoshka, first grandson
I. Selyuk	...	Ataman
L. Barné	...	Monk
L. Parshina	...	Timoshka's wife
P. Sklyar Otawa	...	Okasana - Mountain Princess
A. Simonov	...	Kossak officer

Storyline

Zvenigora stars Nikolai Nademsky (Earth), as the grandfather of Timoshka (Semyon Svashenko), whom he alerts to secret treasure buried in the mountains and the boy spends the rest of his life trying to find... See full synopsis »

---

Plot Keywords:

viking | myth | train | harvest | metal industry | 

---

Genres:

Drama | Fantasy

---

Details

Official Sites:

Grapevine Video [us]

Country:

Soviet Union

Release Date:

13 April 1928 (Russia)

Also Known As:

Der verzauberte Wald

Company Credits

Production Co:

VUFKU

Technical Specs

Runtime:

109 min

Sound Mix:

Silent

Color:

Black and White

Did You Know?

Connections

Featured in Fejezetek a film történetéböl: Az orosz és a szovjet némafilm (1989)

User Reviews

Fascinating for Silent & Russian film enthusiasts - others, probably not.

Looking at the few reviews I've read, I'd like to strike a balance. I'd just bought the recently issued 3 film boxed set of Dovzhenko's War Trilogy, of which, this is the start. I bought the set as it was an absolute bargain, making it little more than the fairly well-known 'Earth' that I'd heard about and wanted to see.

Firstly, I took 'cinematic poetry' to be just that, images and scenes that evoked a story rather than simply reciting it in the usual way. Thus heavy symbolism plays a huge part and I have to disagree with those that say one has to know the subject to appreciate it. I use that word, 'appreciate' rather than 'understand' and it is the very nature of the genre here, known as 'avant-garde' that further takes into realms of fantasy, or, pretentious waffle, if that's how you take it.

Avant-garde is not my favourite genre either but when you consider that this is still the Silent Era - normality would be having a fixed camera, on a studio set and the actors moving around in front of it, in all but the most expensive and adventurous productions. The Russians, at this point, as well some notable German film-makers were doing much more and experimenting with double exposures, cutting, fading, all-sorts, simply to extend both the boundaries of their imagination and cinematic technology.

Of course, film has moved on an awfully long way and so has people's entertainment. These moving images are both historical; a recreated scenario now wouldn't anywhere near the same authenticity - and human. As in stills photography of those days, it is capturing people and their lives that would have seemed so special and fascinating, marrying that up with story-telling would take longer as both film-makers and the public got used to this exciting, new medium. Marx unashamedly exploited artists of all kinds for propaganda purposes and these have, understandably, been seen in a bad light in the West, but thank goodness now, we are finally seeing them for what they are, not were - pioneering and hugely influential.

I'm no historian or film expert and in effect, I haven't really reviewed the title itself but hopefully cast a light on it as a subject. However, I would say that the Mr Bongo reproduction, from the restored print is very good, with hardly a blemish and features a new(?) stereo orchestral score.