Down 8,566 this week

October (Ten Days that Shook the World) (1928)
"Oktyabr" (original title)

Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.6/10 from 4,113 users  
Reviews: 42 user | 14 critic

In documentary style, events in Petrograd are re-enacted from the end of the monarchy in February of 1917 to the end of the provisional government and the decrees of peace and of land in ... See full summary »


(as G. Aleksandrov) , (as S. M. Eisenstein)
0Check in

Watch Now

Free at IMDb

Editors' Spotlight

Alpha House Premieres Today

All ten episodes of the second season of "Alpha House" are available starting today. Watch them now, only on Prime Instant Video.

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 33 titles
created 21 Mar 2011
a list of 25 titles
created 03 Sep 2011
a list of 32 titles
created 12 May 2012
a list of 27 titles
created 01 Jul 2013
a list of 34 titles
created 7 months ago

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: October (Ten Days that Shook the World) (1928)

October (Ten Days that Shook the World) (1928) on IMDb 7.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of October (Ten Days that Shook the World).

User Polls



Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Biography | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

During the early part of his reign, Ivan the Terrible faces betrayal from the aristocracy and even his closest friends as he seeks to unite the Russian people.

Director: Sergei M. Eisenstein
Stars: Nikolai Cherkasov, Lyudmila Tselikovskaya, Serafima Birman
Biography | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.6/10 X  

As Ivan the Terrible attempts to consolidate his power by establishing a personal army, his political rivals, the Russian boyars, plot to assassinate their Tsar.

Director: Sergei M. Eisenstein
Stars: Nikolai Cherkasov, Serafima Birman, Pavel Kadochnikov
Documentary | Drama | Western
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

Eisenstein shows us Mexico in this movie, its history and its culture. He believes, that Mexico can become a modern state.

Director: Sergei M. Eisenstein
Stars: Sergey Bondarchuk, Grigori Aleksandrov
Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

A dramatized account of a great Russian naval mutiny and a resulting street demonstration which brought on a police massacre.

Director: Sergei M. Eisenstein
Stars: Aleksandr Antonov, Vladimir Barsky, Grigori Aleksandrov
Mother (1926)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

The Film Version Of Gorki's Great Story Of The 1905 Revolution

Director: Vsevolod Pudovkin
Stars: Vera Baranovskaya, Nikolai Batalov, Aleksandr Chistyakov
Drama | History | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.4/10 X  

In 1918 a simple Mongolian herdsman escapes to the hills after brawling with a western capitalist fur trader who cheats him. In 1920 he helps the partisans fight for the Soviets against the... See full summary »

Director: Vsevolod Pudovkin
Stars: I. Inkizhinov, I. Dedintsev, Valéry Inkijinoff
Comedy | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8/10 X  

A farcical war between the forces of Commercial Cinema and Independent Cinema.

Directors: Sergei M. Eisenstein, Ivor Montagu, and 1 more credit »
Stars: Jean-Georges Auriol, Béla Balázs, Janine Bouissounouse
Drama | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.3/10 X  

Archive footage from Potemkin (1925), with English dialogue dubbed in by American actors, is combined with new footage to tie together the brave stand of Odessa Russian guerrilla bands of ... See full summary »

Directors: Hans Burger, Sergei M. Eisenstein
Stars: Aleksandr Antonov, Grigori Aleksandrov, Vladimir Barsky
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.7/10 X  
Directors: Grigori Aleksandrov, Sergei M. Eisenstein, and 1 more credit »
Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  

As was common in Diaz's Mexico, a young hacienda worker finds his betrothed imprisoned and his life threatened by his master for confronting a hacienda guest for raping the girl.

Director: Sergei M. Eisenstein
Stars: Martín Hernández, Isabel Villaseñor, Félix Balderas
Idol of Hope (1941)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.9/10 X  
Director: Sergei M. Eisenstein
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.1/10 X  
Director: Sergei M. Eisenstein


Credited cast:
Nikolay Popov ...
Vasili Nikandrov ...
Layaschenko ...
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Chibisov ...
Boris Livanov ...
Mikholyev ...
Nikolai Padvoisky ...
Bolshevik (as N. Podvoisky)
Smelsky ...
Eduard Tisse ...
German Soldier


In documentary style, events in Petrograd are re-enacted from the end of the monarchy in February of 1917 to the end of the provisional government and the decrees of peace and of land in November of that year. Lenin returns in April. In July, counter-revolutionaries put down a spontaneous revolt, and Lenin's arrest is ordered. By late October, the Bolsheviks are ready to strike: ten days will shake the world. While the Mensheviks vacillate, an advance guard infiltrates the palace. Anatov-Oveyenko leads the attack and signs the proclamation dissolving the provisional government. Written by <>

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis


Drama | History


See all certifications »



Release Date:

20 January 1928 (Soviet Union)  »

Also Known As:

October (Ten Days that Shook the World)  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


(2007 restored) | | (DVD special edition)

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


Sergei M. Eisenstein had to remove most of the footage featuring Leon Trotsky. The re-editing caused the film to be reduced to a little over three quarters of its intended length. See more »


V.I. Lenin: We have the right to be proud that to us fell the good fortune of beginning the building of the Soviet State and, by doing so, opening a new chapter in the history of the world.
See more »


Featured in Histoire(s) du cinéma: Les signes parmi nous (1998) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

historically significant, but no longer dramatically compelling
14 September 2010 | by (Ipswich MA) – See all my reviews

This review is of the 103 minute version of "October" with the Shostakovich music on a DVD obtained from Netflix in 2010. (This is seemingly the only version easily available in the U.S. A different version that's fairly similar (but still not identical) to the original "Moscow" version is supposedly available in some places in Europe.) After watching just a few minutes, I was powerfully reminded of two other films:

Like "Triumph of the Will" by Leni Riefenstahl it makes great use of black and white, contains lots of military order and crowd scenes, was assisted and paid for by a government, is accompanied by stirring music, is about people who are dead and no longer anywhere near as relevant as they once were, is by a director very sympathetic to the cause of the political paymasters, and is generally regarded as a "propaganda" film. It definitely has artistic merit, with lots of then-new cutting techniques that gave the camera itself an eloquent and unmistakable editorial voice and that (in more subdued form) have become part of the mainstream. But the content is so obviously propaganda --all too often just plain silly-- that only the arresting images kept me from laughing out loud every few minutes.

I don't fully understand why "Triumph of the Will" is denigrated even now (and wasn't originally picked up by any U.S. distributor), while "October" (even though never all that popular) is sometimes regarded as a "masterpiece". (Note though that decades ago "October" was treated more harshly in the West; originally it was banned in the U.K and somewhat censored in the U.S.) Perhaps the legacy difference is because the ideological attractions of "Triumph of the Will" can sometimes hide below the level of perception, while those of "October" are so blatant and silly they almost demand to be ignored.

Like "Revue" (Soviet archival footage, mostly from the Kruschev era) edited by Sergei Loznitsa it once again makes great use of black and white, uses excellent cinematography throughout, has a lot of closeups of faces, shows people from a very wide range of genetic backgrounds, is often noticeably narrowly selective in its material, and fairly often communicates to us modern viewers very different ideas than what was obviously "intended".

Like any silent film that wants to convey a moderately complex story yet not be interrupted by too many inter-titles, "Ocbober" says a lot through visuals and visual symbols that key into background knowledge the viewer already has. Unfortunately people in the U.S. almost a century later often don't have that necessary background knowledge (so they typically don't even understand how long a period of time the film covers, or that the film easily divides into five relatively independent "acts"). Something like a very detailed guide document or a commentary track by a historian (or maybe even copious additional subtitles) is needed. Without something more, for most of today's U.S. citizens the film is largely incomprehensible.

(This Balkanized Region 1 version -which was long ago cut and even censored in now-forgotten ways- doesn't help either. But the bottom line is that seeing a better version would _not_ improve the experience of "October" all that much. I'm afraid even the original "Moscow" version would be largely incomprehensible to today's U.S. rank and file.)

This presentation of this film also suffers from the typical problem with very old films: the wrong speed. The film was obviously shot at a lower frame rate (maybe as low as 16 fps). But as is typical, it's apparently been transferred to modern equipment using the same 2:3 pull-down used for 24 fps material to NTSC (rather than a more appropriate pull-down pattern that would display the material at the approximately correct speed). So as is typical, all actions seem hurried and jerky, throwing a pall of "unreality" over everything.

This film feels like a compendium of Soviet "founding myths". It must have been very convenient having so much material in one spot and in such an accessible format. It's too bad the analogous U.S. film was "lost" (you know the "lost" film I'm referring to, right? the one where Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson catch George Washington falling out of a cherry tree, they all go off to drink non-tea, while doing so they draft the constitution on a napkin, and then they use pea-shooters to secretly harass some nearby Redcoats:-)

For film history buffs and film technique geeks this is a must-see. Film theory doyens will find this film to be an excellent illustration of many of Eisenstein's own stated formalisms. And serious students of history will enjoy minutely comparing these "stories" against the "real" record, especially to gain insight into what was most important to those in power ten years later. But the rest of us will just have an awfully hard time getting into this film.

3 of 4 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
How much is propaganda and how much is history? alecfisher
Another 'Ten Days That Shook the World' plushing
Score palaceofwong
Flag on the Car whopsee_Daisy
film essay linanuman
Ten Days? redragonstar

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: