MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 14,842 this week

Happiness (1935)
"Schastye" (original title)

 -  Comedy | Drama  -  7 April 1935 (USA)
7.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.6/10 from 497 users  
Reviews: 5 user | 12 critic

A hapless loser (with the surname of Loser) undergoes misadventures with avaracious clergy, a tired horse, and a walking granary (among other things) on his road to collectivized happiness.

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 102 titles
created 15 Nov 2011
 
a list of 11 titles
created 14 Dec 2011
 
a list of 37 titles
created 16 Apr 2012
 
a list of 31 titles
created 19 Mar 2013
 
list image
a list of 20 titles
created 5 months ago
 

Related Items

Search for "Schastye" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Happiness (1935)

Happiness (1935) on IMDb 7.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Happiness.

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Pyotr Zinovyev ...
Khmyr - an ill-fated mujik
Yelena Yegorova ...
Anna Khmyrova - the mujik's wife
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Nikolai Cherkasov
Mikhail Gipsi ...
Taras Platonovich
Viktor Kulakov
V. Lavrentyev
G. Mirgorian
Lidiya Nenasheva ...
Nun
V. Uspensky
Edit

Storyline

A hapless loser (with the surname of Loser) undergoes misadventures with avaracious clergy, a tired horse, and a walking granary (among other things) on his road to collectivized happiness. Written by Erik Gregersen <erik@astro.as.utexas.edu>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Comedy | Drama

Edit

Details

Country:

Release Date:

7 April 1935 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Happiness  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Featured in The Train Rolls On (1973) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
The First Bolshevik / Saint Epiphanius in the bottom of the river
24 March 2012 | by (Greece) – See all my reviews

Happiness as labor, sure enough. A farmer sent by his wife to find it, finds instead a wholly absurd Tsarist Russia where a saint in name would sooner drown than let go a bundle of rubles to the bottom of a river. But does he find it, you would think at long last, when a more subtly absurd Revolution sweeps the countryside?

What a strange, uplifting joy to be able to see this silent Soviet comedy about a hapless schmuck caught in the wheels of a callous world. The filmmaker could have gone for a harmless Chaplin effect, assuming for a moment Stalin's censors stayed their hand, benevolent fates setting up pratfalls all the while taking care of life. The schmuck triumphs because he's pure inside, or a natural performer. But Chaplin was not honest with us. He was a hard worker, a staunch Marxist, but hard work is never a value in his films; no, he made his fortunes by selling people the Dream.

The inspiration here is Buster Keaton, the stone face mute in the face of unfathomable mishap. Dogged effort.

Let's unpack this a little. The wife is strong and resolute to the end, a hard worker, and it pays off for her. But this is not one of those amazingly farcical works dubbed socialist realist at the time and favored by Stalin, celebrating the flipside of that Dream as robust heroes of labor triumph in the fields in the name of the people. These fields are barren, dusty, crops are nowhere. Members of the commune are not all of them content worker bees, they are also cruel, weak, suspicious, human. Filthy brigands stalk the perimeters, the first true revolutionaries for Bakhunin let's not forget. The workers attack them with watermelons, the fruits of labor wasted on a squabble.

But this is not simple criticism or direct confrontation with the regime, which sure enough would have earned Medvedkin a swift execution. Our gain is that this man was forced to find ways to dream further than the state-sponsored Dream had imagination to apprehend him.

So what does he do? He envisions images with enough weight and shadow so that we fill the shape. He sketches dreamlike edges only. Anxious air. The man whipping his wife as she plows the field, otherwise they starve. A shaggy horse towing on its back a wooden cabin as it staggers to grab a meagre bite of hay. A grain storage room absconding on human feet. The man tasked to guard it mystified by the over-sized rifle he's given to guard it with. The same man later hidden in a chest and discovered by authorities by his sicle protruding from the chest.

Make no mistake, the film is speaking about Soviet life in the fields. Its realism is the restless dream, the artifice, the world a size it doesn't fit the people.

Curiously enough, it got past the censors but was mostly panned by the press. His next film didn't, a major loss for us. Soon after, he was rebuked by Party sycophants for daring to speak in favor of Eisenstein's Bezhin Meadow, then in production and soon to be likewise axed and destroyed. By then, the late 30's, it was all over for everyone, the film trains permanently derailed. On the other side, Buster Keaton had missed his own place in a revolution and was on his way to become a weary, beaten old man like the protagonist here.

See if you can find Chris Marker's Last Bolshevik, a documentary where Medvedkin in his old age reminisces on all this.


2 of 2 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Happiness (1935) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?