IMDb > Nana (1926)

Nana (1926) More at IMDbPro »

Photos (See all 7 | slideshow)


User Rating:
6.9/10   481 votes »
Your Rating:
Saving vote...
Deleting vote...
/10   (delete | history)
Sorry, there was a problem
MOVIEmeter: ?
Down 21% in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro.
Pierre Lestringuez (scenario)
Émile Zola (inspired by the novel by)
View company contact information for Nana on IMDbPro.
Release Date:
25 June 1926 (France) See more »
When the vivacious and beautiful Nana bombs at the Théâtre des Variétés, she embarks on the life of a courtesan, using her allure and charisma to entice and pleasure men. Full summary » | Add synopsis »
User Reviews:
A solid and entertaining silent film by the father of French cinema, Jean Renoir… See more (10 total) »


  (in credits order)

Catherine Hessling ... Nana
Pierre Lestringuez ... Bordenave (as Pierre Philippe)
Jacqueline Forzane ... La Comtesse Sabine Muffat

Werner Krauss ... Le Comte Muffat
Jean Angelo ... Le Comte de Vandeuvres
Raymond Guérin-Catelain ... Georges Hugon (as R. Guérin Catelain)
Claude Autant-Lara ... Fauchery (as Claude Moore)
Pierre Champagne ... Hector de la Faloise
Karl Harbacher ... Francis - le coiffeur (as Arbacher)

Valeska Gert ... Zoe - la femme de chambre
Jacqueline Ford ... Rose Mignon

Dennis Price ... Le jockey de 'Nana' (as Price)
Gresham ... Le jockey de 'Lusignan'
Luc Dartagnan ... Maréchal - le bookmaker (as Dartagnan)
Nita Romani ... Satin
Roberto Pla ... Bosc (as R. Pla)
Gorieux ... Le médecin
rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Pierre Braunberger ... Un spectateur (uncredited)
André Cerf ... The Tiger (uncredited)
René Koval ... Fontan (uncredited)

Marie Prevost ... Gaga (uncredited)
Raymond Turgy ... Un spectateur (uncredited)

Directed by
Jean Renoir 
Writing credits
Pierre Lestringuez (scenario)

Émile Zola (inspired by the novel by)

Denise Leblond (intertitles) (as Mme Le Blond Zola)

Produced by
Jean Renoir .... producer
Original Music by
Marc-Olivier Dupin (2002)
Maurice Jaubert 
Cinematography by
Jean Bachelet 
Edmund Corwin  (as C. E. Corwin)
Film Editing by
Jean Renoir 
Art Direction by
Claude Autant-Lara 
Costume Design by
Claude Autant-Lara  (as C. Autant Lala)
Second Unit Director or Assistant Director
André Cerf .... assistant director
Visual Effects by
W. Percy Day .... matte painter
Music Department
Gabriel Benlolo .... musician: percussion - Dupin score
Benjamin Caillaud .... assistant music recordist: Dupin score
Dominique Collemare .... musician: trumpet - Dupin score
Jean-Baptiste Courtois .... musician: harmonium - Dupin score
Anne-Cécile Cuniot .... musician: flute - Dupin score
Hélène Devilleneuve .... musician: oboe - Dupin score
Marc-Olivier Dupin .... conductor: new score
Clément Escaffre .... assistant music recordist: Dupin score
Jérome Julien-Laferrière .... musician: clarinet - Dupin score
Valérie Kafelnikov .... musician: harp - Dupin score
Hae Sun Kang .... musician: violin - Dupin score
Sylvain Le Provost .... musician: double bass - Dupin score
Jean-Loup Morette .... music recordist: Dupin score
Takenori Nemoto .... musician: horn - Dupin score
Frank Sibold .... musician: bassoon - Dupin score
Benny Sluchin .... musician: trombone - Dupin score
Renaud Stahl .... musician: alto - Dupin score
Agnès Vesterman .... musician: cello - Dupin score

Production CompaniesDistributors

Additional Details

Also Known As:
150 min
Aspect Ratio:
1.20 : 1 See more »
Sound Mix:

Did You Know?

Movie Connections:


This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
A solid and entertaining silent film by the father of French cinema, Jean Renoir…, 20 June 2015
Author: Andrew Boone from Baltimore, Maryland

"Nana" (1926) is the third film by the great Jean Renoir. I've been unable to find his first film, which he co-directed with another filmmaker, but having seen his second film and solo debut, "La fille de l'eau" (a.k.a. "Whirlpool of Fate"; 1925), I was a bit surprised by "Nana", for a few reasons.

First, there's the star of both films, Catherine Hessling. In "La fille de l'eau", she played an innocent young girl, and she did so about as well as could be expected, given how almost absurdly overdrawn her character was in terms of virtue and purity. In "Nana", suffice it to say, her role is a bit different. She plays a tart, a prostitute. Once again, her character is ridiculously exaggerated, caricatured to an absolutely laughable extent. Here, however, unlike in Renoir's last film, Hessling does nothing to help matters. Her acting in "Nana" is so over the top that it at times becomes a marked hindrance to the integrity of the film. I would expect this kind of performance in a Keystone comedy from 1914, maybe, but not from a Renoir film in the latter half of the '20s.

Furthermore, the narrative breaks down into tragic melodrama in the latter portion of the film, and any thematic substance from the first half of the film is ultimately diluted in the perceived necessities of plot and story. This is unfortunate, but not unexpected; it's common of so many silents from this era.

That, however, is about the extent of my criticism for the film. It's a good film, overall, or at least a solid one. In some ways it surpasses "La fille de l'eau", and in other ways it falls short of it. The narrative in "Nana" is stronger than its predecessor's: The characters are more complex and less archetypal, and the themes are more pronounced while they last. To venture further into the subjective, I'd say that "Nana" has higher entertainment value than Renoir's last film, and that it's more dramatically engaging.

On the other hand, there was an element of visual poetry in "La fille de l'eau" that is missing from "Nana". Perhaps it's the issue of color tinting, at least in part. I've always felt that color tinting degrades a film's artistic value. "La fille de l'eau" was not tinted, and it preserved a certain artistry in the film's aesthetic that the tinted images in "Nana" simply can not match. I will concede, though, that if Renoir is going to insist on color tinting, the tinting in "Nana" is handled well — a series of similarly toned warm tints, providing a more consistent visual mood than, for instance, the messy rainbow of colors from all parts of the visible spectrum in Fritz Lang's "The Spiders" films.

"La fille de l'eau" also featured impressive montage, and one wonders where the editing talents displayed in that film disappeared to for "Nana". That's not to say that "Nana" is poorly edited, but simply that it doesn't exhibit the noticeably skilled use of montage that we saw in the former film. Renoir is credited for the editing in "Nana", whereas I can't find a credit for the editing in "La fille de l'eau", so it's possible that it wasn't Renoir's editing talents that we saw in that film, although I'm still willing to guess that it was.

Finally, "La fille de l'eau" gets a nudge for a fantastic dream sequence that I'm sure anyone who saw the film will remember. But enough contrasting. There are certainly similarities as well. The most obvious place where the two films can be compared is in their social inclinations. Both films, and for that matter every Renoir film I've ever seen, feature a blending of characters from different social classes. "Boudu Saved From Drowning", "The Lower Depths", "Grand Illusion", "The Diary of a Chambermaid", "The Golden Coach" — Renoir loves to throw lower class characters and upper class characters into the same setting and see what comes of it. It's his way of exploring his humanist disposition. Other filmmakers have done it in their own way. Kurosawa liked to look to the lower classes alone to find the true nature of humanity. Visconti, though not exactly a humanist, liked to look largely to the upper classes to explore human nature. Renoir likes to look at both, together — the coexistence of the two in a particular setting — and he defines humanity through the shared qualities, as well as the conflicts, that arise under those conditions.

"Nana" is a very much a male film, in that, like Luis Buñuel, there is a focus on the power of the female, and the manner in which a woman can trigger a maelstrom of chaos in the lives of the men who fall at her feet, and who set aside everything — even that most precious social status and respectability — in order to attain the object of their passion. This theme has the potential to be feminist, of course, but not here. The film's sympathies are almost entirely with the despairing male characters, and the female tantalizer is depicted as an absolutely ridiculous human being (although she is ultimately afforded a small degree of humanity).

On a side note, there's a role in 'Nana" for Werner Krauss, the German actor who appeared in films like Wiene's "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari" and Pabst's "The Joyless Street". He's good. In fact, excluding Catherine Hessling, the whole cast is pretty good.

The film is made by a fairly young and inexperienced Jean Renoir, and yet it is clearly the work of a professional. Renoir was not the master of the cinema that he would later become, but already he was a good filmmaker, and his talent for storytelling is evident even this early in his career.

RATING: 6.00 out of 10 stars

Was the above review useful to you?
See more (10 total) »

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Nana (1926)


If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
Germinal Nana Atonement Damage Quartet
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
News articles IMDb Drama section IMDb France section

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Edit page' button will take you through a step-by-step process.