MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 5,398 this week

Robin Hood (1922)

7.8
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.8/10 from 1,281 users  
Reviews: 19 user | 11 critic

A nobleman becomes the vigilante Robin Hood who protects the oppressed English people from the tyrannical Prince John.

Director:

Writer:

(story)
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 48 titles
created 20 Aug 2011
 
a list of 31 titles
created 20 Feb 2012
 
a list of 48 titles
created 6 months ago
 
a list of 29 titles
created 6 months ago
 
a list of 29 titles
created 3 months ago
 

Search for "Robin Hood" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Robin Hood (1922)

Robin Hood (1922) on IMDb 7.8/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Robin Hood.

User Polls

1 win. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
...
Sam De Grasse ...
Prince John (as Sam de Grasse)
...
Paul Dickey ...
William Lowery ...
Roy Coulson ...
The King's Jester
Billie Bennett ...
Lady Marian's Serving Woman
Merrill McCormick ...
Henchman to Prince John
Wilson Benge ...
Henchman to Prince John
Willard Louis ...
...
Bud Geary ...
Will Scarlett (as Maine Geary)
Lloyd Talman ...
...
Edit

Storyline

Amid big-budget medieval pageantry, King Richard goes on the Crusades leaving his brother Prince John as regent, who promptly emerges as a cruel, grasping, treacherous tyrant. Apprised of England's peril by message from his lady-love Marian, the dashing Earl of Huntingdon endangers his life and honor by returning to oppose John, but finds himself and his friends outlawed, and Marian apparently dead. Enter Robin Hood, acrobatic champion of the oppressed, laboring to set things right through swash buckling feats and cliffhanging perils! Written by Rod Crawford <puffinus@u.washington.edu>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Certificate:

See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

18 October 1922 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Douglas Fairbanks in Robin Hood  »

Box Office

Budget:

$1,500,000 (estimated)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

(video) | (AMC print) (1997) | (Raymond Rohauer print) (2012)

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The castle is reputed to be the largest Hollywood set built for any silent movie. Lloyd Wright, Frank Lloyd Wright's son, designed at least one set which he later remodeled as a temporary band shell for the Hollywood Bowl. See more »

Connections

Version of The Adventures of Robin Hood (1955) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Good Entertainment & An Ideal Role For Fairbanks
10 May 2002 | by (Ohio) – See all my reviews

The Douglas Fairbanks version of "Robin Hood" is still good entertainment despite showing its age at times. The role gives Fairbanks a perfect chance to display his energy and charisma, and he is helped by lavish sets and scenery that recreate the world of medieval England. Wallace Beery as King Richard also is a nice complement to Fairbanks. Later versions, such as the Errol Flynn version which is still the best of all the Robin Hood movies, had many resources available to them that this one didn't, but this older version works well and is more enjoyable than most of the more recent movies based on the legend.

The story and characters are familiar from many other books and movies. But it includes some interesting scenes that cover or add parts of the legend that are not in a lot of other versions - for example, about the first half of this movie takes place before any of the events in the Flynn movie. It makes it interesting to watch even if you've already seen plenty of other "Robin Hoods", and amongst other things it gives Beery as Richard a lot more screen time. It is acted in the somewhat exaggerated style of many of the silent melodramas of the era, but in this case that tone, while perhaps providing an occasional unintentional chuckle, fits rather well with the subject matter. It's also worth paying attention to the grand sets that were constructed for the film. They were apparently rather renowned in their day, and they still do a good job of evoking the right background. Overall, it was a very good film for its time and one worth watching today.


8 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Well, I knew about the big sets for this film, but Damn! bushrod56
Double for Fairbanks? donovanarchmontierth
Discuss Robin Hood (1922) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?