IMDb > Nosferatu (1922) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb
Nosferatu, eine Symphonie des Grauens
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
Overview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany credits
Awards & Reviews
user reviewsexternal reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guidemessage board
Plot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsmemorable quotes
Did You Know?
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
box office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specsliterature listingsNewsDesk
Promotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips

Reviews & Ratings for
Nosferatu More at IMDbPro »Nosferatu, eine Symphonie des Grauens (original title)

Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Page 8 of 35: [Prev][3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [Next]
Index 346 reviews in total 

2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

If you have never had sushi...

10/10
Author: A_Different_Drummer from North America
13 April 2014

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

On Google you can get statistics on how often men who work in high rise towers use the washroom (don't bother) but I keep waiting to see stats on the number of "serious" cineastes who have never seen a silent film...? Some think that, like sushi, it is an acquired taste. Not really. Remember that, in the age of books (those rectangular things made of folded paper), readers had to "imagine" BOTH the visuals and the audio. So here we are one step closer to Imax, if you prefer to think of it that way. Anyway, if you have never seen a silent film, this is where you want to start. The strangeness of both the film and the actor (Shreck) have never been duplicated. The movie is unforgettable, a term I cannot readily recall using often in my reviews. So unforgettable that (this is extraordinary) some 80 years later Hollywood did an entire production not as a remake, but rather an alleged narrative based on the filming of the original -- and that film hinted that the reason the actor in the first was so effective was because (wait for it...) he was a real vampire who just lucked into getting the part. Wow.

(Another silent film recommendation: the original Zorro, demonstrates what we today call "athleticism" to a degree that is extraordinary).

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

First and the best of vampire movies

10/10
Author: Galina from Virginia, USA
12 February 2009

Sometimes, I think that from over hundred years of Cinema history the best, the most creative and exciting years were in the relative beginning, in the first decades of the 20th Century. The old films that I've watched lately don't seem old - they are timeless. Their beauty and mystery -unsurpassable, their influence - immense, the pleasure they bring - incomparable. Nosferatu, eine Symphonie des Grauens made in 1922 by F.W. Murnau is one of these movies. It is so finely crafted, so well thought of, so lovingly produced, so beautiful to look at, and so creepy and genuinely scary that I believe it will stay one of the best films of the horror genre and true inspiration for present and future directors, and not just horror film directors. A Symphony of Horror is a pure cinematic delight, poetry on screen from the first shot to the final. Werner Herzog came quite close in 1979 in his updated color version of the same film but I prefer Murnau's film a bit more, perhaps, because it was the first one and Murnau had no previous film to compare to or more likely, because no one, even fabulous Kinski could not be as creepy and frightening as Max Shreck.

The B&W photography with astounding use of sepia gave some scenes a somber dramatic, Gothic tone. Each frame deserved to be captured and enjoyed for the sheer beauty and elegance. The scenery was breathtaking, storytelling - solid and compelling. Hans Erdman's 1922 score created a perfect sound background for the story. The most fascinating asset of the film though was not even acting but simply presence of Max Shreck. What a mesmerizing magnificent ugliness that would not let you take your eyes off his face, fangs, ears, and spider like fingers. The first film in the vampire series, Nosferatu started genre of poetic horror, the most interesting and artful in the family of horror films.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

A truly terrifying film classic

8/10
Author: Vampenguin from Canada
10 April 2006

One of the few truly terrifying films ever made, Nosferatu is a classic film, pure and simple. The atmosphere is phenomenal, just bristling with that early German style. Max Shrek looks incredible as Orlock, easily the most terrifying image of a vampire of all-time. As for the score, I saw the Type O Negative version. Very uneven, though at times it's truly amazing. In many scenes it seems very out of place, but in others such as the infamous Door scene, it fit perfectly and elevated the tension of an already scary scene. The actors weren't very good, but it's not often you see a silent film with good actors. Overall this is one of the only films that can actually scare me. Though Dracula '31 is easily a better film, it doesn't even hold a candle to this in terms of pure scare factor.

8.5/10

PS - The DVD I have had a rather interesting introduction by David Carradine that I enjoyed.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

History of Nosferatu: The Basic History

Author: AMysticSeer from United States
5 April 2006

This film is a classic of the German film director Friedrich Wilhelm Murnau.

Nosferatu meaning "Likes the Blood", was originally determined by the wife of Bram Stoker to be a illegal film copy of her husbands book. Just before the film Dracula(1931) was released she made sure that every copy of the film had been destroyed or so she thought.

When this event happened, F. W. Murnau was horribly hurt because he made the film as a tribute to his favorite book and writer Bram Stoker.

Later in the 1930's film copies of Nosferatu started showing up in Austria and only three copies are known to exist today, this film was the only true showing of what Stoker wanted his Dracula to be like and it was captured well by the master of horror F. W. Murnau.

In fact, the Dracula film was way off from what Stoker intended his vampire to be like. He said Alucard was a ugly malformed dawn walking monster. His family didn't want to scare children, so the vampire was turned into a handsome smooth talking gentleman, but this was not the way Stoker would have wanted it, so current films are ruined because of the rudeness of Mrs. Stoker a true loser.

We rate Mrs. Stoker to be a true loser because if she had gotten her way Nosferatu wouldn't exist today and I would have never gotten a view of the most interesting film at early parts of the 1920's.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

Still has great staying power

8/10
Author: aqua_swing from Canada
2 December 2005

There are many things that place this film in your "see before you die" category. It's a priceless, fantastic piece of work, from start to finish, and it has beautiful staying power, even now. But there are a few things that work against it. The music to the film lends neither good, nor bad to it. Understandably, this is very early film, and perception of people watching the film in the twenties was probably vastly different, but seeing as this could be considered one of the earliest horror movies, the music from this film could very much have been better used in a silent drama, or comedy.

On that note, Max Schreck is perfect. Much has been said about his ability to capture the character so perfectly (as in Shadow of the Vampire), and it's true. Though it's in no way comparable to Bela Lugosi as a character, this movie is still a very important piece in cinema, and I'm honored to be able to say that I've had the opportunity to sit down and enjoy a brilliant work of early cinema.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

Remarkable

7/10
Author: johnwolpert from Toronto, Ontario
21 February 2002

In the opening scenes, "Nosferatu" establishes itself through a series of ominous images: an obscured sunset, a silenced crowd at a Carpathian inn, and two of the most dreadfully frightening characters I've ever witnessed in a film. Max Schreck and Alexander Granach play Count Orlock and Mackler Knock respectively, and both deliver performances that, even though they are silent, evoke as much fear and mystery as Hannibal Lecter.

What is so impressive about this film is that it is able to inspire fear without modern horror film conventions. No objects suddenly revealing themselves alongside a bold musical note, no horror villain stereotypes. This movie inspires fear through the manipulation of its characters; their movements, their costume and in the case of Count Orlock, their slow, foreboding walk. The most frightening point in this film is when the wide eyes of Max Schreck are first seen. This is not the kind of horror that warrants a scream, but rather leaves you completely silent and in awe of its genius

I gave this movie a 9 almost exclusively because of its innovation and artistry. The plot, which bares little resemblance to the Stoker novel in that it doesn't include many of the sub-stories, is not as enthralling as recent versions. Then again it doesn't need it, the purpose is clear and apparent; Nosferatu is not suave or manipulating, it is a torn, haunted soul and this movie gives the only sincere depiction of Dracula that I have seen. Truly remarkable.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

First Dracula Film

Author: eibon04 from New York City, NY
30 August 2001

Atmospheric and expressionistic horror classic that was part of a fruitful period in German art especially the cinema. During the 1920s German cinema flousished with films that gave us images ranging from bizarre to breathtaking. The Greatest horror film of the Silent period because there isn't any other film of its genre that is amazing in visual storytelling. Excellent direction by a pioneer of German Cinema, F.W. Murnau. He was one of the best directors from his country besides Fritz Lang and a couple other German filmmakers. Nosferatu(1922) is Dracula in everything but namesake. Max Schreck is menacing as the mysterious and sad figure Count Dracula. Remade into a very good picture by Werner Herzog with a faithful homage to Max Schreck by Klaus Kinski. The greatest adaptation of the Dracula story ever put on the motion picture screen.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

The first horror masterpiece impeccably restored.

8/10
Author: Arne Andersen (aandersen@landmarkcollege.org) from Putney, VT
27 August 2001

With well over a hundred reviews on IMDB and Amazon, and with only a few disappointed viewers, this seminal work by Murnau is proven yet again to be a masterpiece of horror, as enjoyable today as when it was first released. The print I saw on TCM is the newly restored, tinted and complete version (84 minutes compared to the 63 of most earlier video releases) and it is like night and day compared to the earlier available materials. This is the sharpest print I have seen and the tinting is excellent (yellow, brown, red, lavender and blue take us from full sun to interiors, to sunsets, to twilight to night). The adaptation is masterly and the "gimmicks" used to great effect. Was it a joke or deliberate that a mirror is placed leaning on the wall behind the creature as it feeds on Ellen with Orlock clearly reflected in it - we first see her husband as the film opens also preening in front of a mirror. Is this a Freudian Jekyll and Hyde story as well as a vampire film? Very highly recommended for all who love film and masterful direction.

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

THE Vampire Movie

10/10
Author: Jared G.
3 October 1999

In my opinion, this is the best vampire movie made, ever. But beyond that, it is an incredibly powerful visual film as well. Max Shreck looks simply fantastic in the makeup that SHOULD have defined the role that would be inherited by Bela Lugosi. The only vampire movie that stands up to this one is "Vampyr".

Was the above review useful to you?

3 out of 5 people found the following review useful:

Buffy who?

10/10
Author: liminalone from United States
10 April 2007

The legendary vampire film, over three quarters of a century old and still worth watching. Say that about yourself when seventy-seven you are, as Yoda would put it. It's also hosted by David Carradine, he provides a short opening piece which seems blue screened for some reason.

For those of you who were raised by wolves and haven't seen this film before, the plot follows. Knock receives a letter from Orlok. The Count wishes to buy a home in Bremen, he quickly dispatches his assistant Hutter with the necessary contracts. Thomas arrives in Transylvannia to find the Count is a frightening visage, though he first chalks up the strange happenings as bad dreams. Too late he realizes that Orlok is a vampire and the monster wants Ellen (after seeing her picture in a locket).

The vampire's earth filled coffins are loaded on the ship Demeter; en route across the seas crew die one by one as he drains their life. Meanwhile, Thomas struggles to reach Ellen by land, arriving after the crewless Demeter docks. With Nosferatu's coming a plague falls upon the city, it is only when Ellen sacrifices herself that evil is banished.

This version is remastered and includes the most enjoyable soundtrack I've seen it put to yet. Type O Negative's metal/Gothic songs rarely seem out of place and then only for moments. The film itself is a masterpiece, with a tidy plot and excellent makeup for Nosferatu.

Was the above review useful to you?


Page 8 of 35: [Prev][3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [Next]

Add another review


Related Links

Plot summary Plot synopsis Ratings
Awards Newsgroup reviews External reviews
Parents Guide Official site Plot keywords
Main details Your user reviews Your vote history