| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Index | 12 reviews in total |
14 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
It's a long way from Keystone: Charlie has evolved from scamp to hero, 18 September 2005
![]()
Author:
wmorrow59 from Westchester County, NY
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
This is one of my favorite Chaplin shorts, but that's not the same as
saying it's one of his funniest. Gags notwithstanding, THE VAGABOND is
certainly the most serious film Chaplin had produced up to this time.
You might say this short was something of a dress rehearsal for THE
KID, a vehicle Chaplin the filmmaker devised in order to relate a
melodramatic story in a straightforward fashion, and permit his Tramp
to explore the role of hero. Having already proved decisively that he
could provoke laughter, it appears Chaplin wanted to see if he could
inspire enough sympathy to draw viewers into a dramatic situation, move
them and make them care what happens to his "little fellow." In my
opinion he succeeded admirably, for watching this movie almost 90 years
after it was released I find it still works beautifully, like a vintage
automobile kept in perfect working order.
Although this project marked a new chapter for Chaplin he concocted it
from decidedly old-fashioned ingredients. The plot must have felt
familiar to audiences even in 1916: leading lady Edna Purviance plays a
young woman who was kidnapped by gypsies as a child and has been held
captive as their "drudge" ever since. Charlie is a traveling musician
who rescues her-- after an exhilarating fight in which Edna takes part
--and, having fallen in love with her, is prepared to take care of her
forever after, but the idyll is interrupted when a handsome young
artist happens by and paints Edna's portrait, which he takes back to
the city to exhibit. Her wealthy mother sees the picture in a gallery,
recognizes a distinctive birthmark, and realizes that her daughter has
been located. With the artist in tow, the mother arrives at Charlie's
camp via automobile and brusquely takes her daughter away, leaving
Charlie forlorn, but Edna belatedly becomes aware of her feelings for
Charlie and orders the car to turn back and retrieve him.
As a lead-in to the melodrama concerning the gypsies Chaplin gives us a
conventionally comic opening sequence set in a tavern, where Charlie, a
busking fiddler, has a run-in with a combo of musicians who are
competing for coins from the same clientèle. But even here it's
striking how much Charlie has evolved since Keystone days: when he
pockets the coins intended for the combo it's an honest mistake, he
sincerely believes the money is a reward for his performance, and when
he's confronted he doesn't understand why but promptly defends himself.
Charlie is no longer the aggressor, no longer larcenous, drunk or rude:
all of a sudden, and only two years after his screen debut, he's
matured into a likable, sympathetic character.
It's to Chaplin's credit that the birthmark recognition device, ever
popular in the world of operetta, is served up straight and somehow
doesn't feel hokey. Maybe that's because THE VAGABOND plays like a
dramatized folktale, what with its wicked gypsies, strolling minstrel,
and damsel in distress; the birthmark feels just as natural in this
context as Cinderella's glass slipper or Rapunzel's hair. Charlie's
rescue of Edna and their escape together in one of the gypsies' own
wagons is a thrilling sequence, splendidly filmed and edited, belying
those critics who insist that Chaplin the director was somehow
insufficiently "cinematic." This is followed by a poignant scene set
the following morning in which Charlie helps Edna clean herself up. The
tone is gentle and the gags are mild, and by the time the scene ends
we're won over. Charlie doesn't have to "be funny" every moment he's on
screen, we're hooked, we care what happens to this guy and the girl
he's rescued. And when Edna's head is turned by another man and it
looks like Charlie's going to get jilted, it's heart-breaking.
As noted, this is not the most laugh-packed comedy Chaplin ever made,
but it's nonetheless one of his strongest short films and therefore
highly recommended to silent comedy buffs and to anyone open to viewing
great works from the cinema's early days. Personally I feel that THE
VAGABOND is Chaplin's first short masterpiece.
7 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
An interesting step in his development as an artist, 1 February 2004
Author:
hausrathman
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
In "The Vagabond," Charlie plays a street musician who rescues a girl, Edna
Purviance, from a gypsy camp. They set up their own little camp and Charlie
soon falls in love with Edna, but before long a rival soon appears in the
form of a painter who asks Edna to model for him. A wealthy woman sees the
painting in an exhibit and, as a result of a birthmark, recognizes Edna as
her daughter who was stolen away as a child. The mother and painter come
and sweep Edna up away from Charlie. However, as they drive away, she
suddenly demands that they go back and get Charlie, who gets into the car
with them and they all live happily ever after.
"The Vagabond," the third of Chaplin's twelve films for the Mutual Company,
is probably the least humorous of the series, but it is also one of the most
interesting. This film is essentially a melodrama, and serves as an
important creative building block toward his heartfelt feature triumphs that
would follow in the twenties and beyond. Chaplin's contract with Mutual
gave him the freedom to experiment, and that he did. A film like this was a
riskier proposition back in the age of slapstick when comedy was comedy and
drama was drama. Today, this is not the first place to look for Chaplin the
laugh-getter, but an interesting curio to examine when studying Chaplin's
growth as an artist.
8 out of 10 people found the following review useful:
An Interesting Sign of Things to Come, 30 August 2001
Author:
Snow Leopard from Ohio
This must have seemed like a real change-of-pace from Chaplin when it first
came out, since it has a much different tone than almost any of his previous
short features. It has a few funny moments, but this time humor is not the
emphasis - except for the familiar presence of Charlie's usual tramp-like
character, it feels more like one of the short melodramas from the same era,
rather than a comedy.
As "The Vagabond", Charlie performs a few antics, mostly towards the
beginning, but then gets involved in the life of a young woman in distress
(Chaplin regular Edna Purviance), and the story turns more serious. It is
not one of his best films, but it is always watchable, and is quite
interesting as a fore-runner of the way that Chaplin would combine slapstick
and humanity to much greater effect in the masterpieces that he would go on
to create some years later.
5 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
Funny Chaplin Short, 8 April 2005
![]()
Author:
drednm
The Vagabond is a funny short film that features Charlie Chaplin as The Tramp. Here he's a wandering violinist who bizarrely finds himself in a gypsy camp, where The Gypsy Drudge--the lovely Edna Purviance--is slaving over a wash tub. He falls in love right away. Several funny episodes here and an oddly happy ending, but there is plenty of Chaplin's stock in trade: masterful comedy, sight gags, and that Victorian sweetness that makes his films so special. Chaplin was a master of creating laughter and tears, and his best films do both. The Kid and City Lights are among the most emotional films you'll ever see. Edna Purviance made more than 20 films with Chaplin and should have been a star in her own right. Eric Campbell, Albert Austin, Charlotte Mineau, and Leo White (as a the gypsy hag) co-star.
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Rover, wanderer, nomad, vagabond, call me what you will
, 23 April 2008
![]()
Author:
Michael DeZubiria (miked32@hotmail.com) from Luoyang, China
Chaplin starts out The Vagabond playing in a bar, basically as a street
performer, but soon finds himself run out by the more fully developed
band who is unhappy that he's stealing their customers. Soon he wanders
out into the woods and almost aimlessly stumbles across a group of
backwards country people. There is a hunch-backed hag of a woman that
looks like a witch but is probably the wife of a mountain of a man who
likes to beat the women around him and carries a huge whip wherever he
goes. This guy is ripe for a slapstick smack down.
There's an amusing scene where a young girl is beaten by the man and
then Charlie shows up and tries to cheer her up by going nuts on the
violin, succeeding only in getting too excited and falling into a tub
of water behind him. After a series of unfortunate events, he trades
his trademark cane in for a bigger stick and proceeds to knock out all
the men in sight, finally making off with the young girl and the
family's house, which is really just a horse-drawn wagon.
I am curious about one of the first things that happens after he
"liberates" her from her family. He takes a tub of water and roughly
scrubs her face, sticking his fingers into her ears and nose while he
washes her. The fact that he washes her face rather than allowing her
to do it herself is obviously a physical comedy ploy, but it also gave
me the feeling that he is sort of washing the country off of her,
turning her into a respectable woman.
At any rate, soon she stumbles upon an artist who finds her so
beautiful that he wants to paint her, and the result is so wonderful
that she gains a following in the uppity art world. Soon some rich art
fans show up to take save her from a life in rags and bring her,
presumably, to the big city. Charlie refuses a reward (or payment for
selling the girl, as it were) and simply hugs the girl and probably
wishes her good luck as she sets off in the big car. But the girl
decides she doesn't want to leave without him, so they turn around and
go back for him.
This story is fraught with problems, of course, like if she would ever
start to miss her family or if her upbringing in the big city would
conflict with her background as a country girl, and the ending is also
a little too cute and neat, but for Chaplin's early silent comedies,
this is a very complex story with a definable beginning, middle and
end. I felt a little uncomfortable during the face-washing scene, but
overall this is definitely a higher quality example of Chaplin's early
work.
1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Chaplin's Third Mutual Effort Unique And Entertaining, 1 September 2008
![]()
Author:
CitizenCaine from Las Vegas, Nevada
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Chaplin edited, wrote, directed, and produced this film for Mutual in July of 1916 and it stands the test of time, even more so than many of his earlier much funnier films. The reason probably is that the structure of this film, more than any predating it, resembles (however crudely) the basic plot structure of films today. There is a definitive beginning, middle, and end in this film. The film is well edited and written for its time. Chaplin plays a wandering vagabond who tries to make a living playing his violin in public. The film opens in typical Chaplin fashion with misunderstandings and chases punctuated by sight gags and slapstick. There are those viewers who may wander what the tavern scenario has to do with the rest of the film, and the answer is it sets up Chaplin as a resourceful fellow who gets by with his wits and not his fists. Thus when he meets the sad, browbeaten Edna Purviance, it's clear what Chaplin must do to extricate her from a band of cruel gypsies; he must use some good old-fashioned ingenuity. After rescuing her from the likes of the crude, whip-wielding Eric Campbell in comic fashion, the story settles into its melodramatic mode. The film successfully combines bits of comedy, plot, and pathos-inducing drama in a way that previous Chaplin films had not. The result is a rough draft of the Chaplin formula, which he would later reuse to greater effect and success in his longer features. *** of 4 stars.
2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Early Chaplin: Shades of Pathos, 9 August 2005
Author:
Cineanalyst
"The Vagabond" represents quite an evolution for Chaplin. He had
already proved himself the funniest comedian on screen and was already
in the process of distancing himself from the crude and frantic
slapstick of Keystone. With this film, more than any afore, he
recreated the tramp as a character worthy of pity. Here begins the
pathetic hero whom audiences could invest their emotions in. At Mutual,
adding this drama to his refinements in his comedy, he created in the
tramp, cinema's most endearing and recognizable icon.
In the film, the vagabond violinist saves the girl (Edna Purviance, as
usual) from a terrible gypsy chieftain who whips her. Although Charlie
saves her by hitting the gypsies over the heads with a log, there isn't
much that's funny about this sequence; it's as purely dramatic as
Chaplin's films ever get. And, it perfectly sets Chaplin up as the hero
for the sentimental denouement. Additionally, rather than an equally
rough and comic clown or a heavy as the tramp's competition for the
girl, here, it's a handsome gentleman artist--leaving the tramp feeling
inadequate--and to us, more sympathetic than ever.
2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
More aspiration than comedy, 18 January 2003
Author:
bob the moo from Birmingham, UK
A pathetic fiddler tries to scrape a living together playing on the street
and in bars. He chances upon a gypsy camp where he plays for a pretty
young
girl. However her father beats her savagely and the tramp helps her
escape.
When the pair happen upon a painter, events are set in motion to reveal
the
girl's true parentage.
One of Chaplin's Mutual short films this shows him still developing the
kindly tramp personae on film. As a result the humour is not yet fully
developed although we do get one funny scene of people being hit over the
head etc. The plot is as basic as above and is typical of the day -
audiences wanted to see the poor people suddenly being elevated to better
things, no matter what the device. However from modern views I wanted
Chaplin to be funnier and the message to be toned down or at least be more
realistic.
Overall this will please fans of Chaplin and I think it is one of the
first
films he directed himself. The cast are good and it's always nice to see
the little tramp act done well. However more routines and less aspiration
would have been better.
0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
"His romance fading", 18 January 2010
![]()
Author:
Steffi_P from Ruritania
By the time he made the Vagabond, Charlie Chaplin was not just the most
popular comic on the screen, he was a fully fledged hero of cinema. It
seemed that, so long as he continued to be funny, he could do no wrong,
and people would always want to watch him.
And just the opening shot of the Vagabond shows Chaplin's confidence in
his own familiarity and popularity. He appears here as just a pair of
feet below a saloon door, his gait alone being enough for audiences to
recognise him. He then walks to the back of the set, to a point
squeezed between the wall and the edge of the frame, while some other
musicians set up in the foreground. The framing provided by the wall,
plus the fact that the little tramp is inherently interesting to us as
an audience, mean that our focus is upon him. These are not just good
approaches for comedy, they are professional cinematic techniques that
any director could put to use.
Then, as usually happens, a plot begins to emerge from this situation,
but the Vagabond's is a plot with an important difference. Not because
the story is extremely poignant (so were those in The Tramp and The
Bank) or neatly structured (as was that of Police), but because Chaplin
treats the dramatic scenes purely as drama. He backs up the subplot
with a few completely straight scenes, with naturalistic acting and
camera moves that would have been distracting in a comedy scene but
give added impact here. The slow dolly back from Purviance's portrait,
beginning with just the picture then gradually revealing its setting
and the growing crowd of admirers, really demonstrates Chaplin's
competence and understanding as a director.
But what is amazing here is the ease with which Chaplin and his cast
are able to slip so freely between comedy and drama. Charlotte Mineau
gives what must be her best performance, and Edna Purviance shows a
greater expanse of her range than we have hitherto seen. Most
incredible of all is the acting of Charlie himself, his face a little
hard to read under the toothbrush moustache, but doing some carefully
nuanced work with gesture and body language. Lastly an honourable
mention goes to Leo White, one of my all-time favourite Chaplin
co-stars, in his last ever appearance with Charlie. He's not easy to
recognise here (he's the gypsy harridan!), but doing a nice and very
funny job as always. This wasn't the end for White though; he had
various supporting roles through the rest of the silent era, and has a
blink-and-miss-it bit part in virtually every Warner Brothers picture
of the 30s and 40s.
The only flaw in the Vagabond is the final twenty seconds, a vulgar and
forced happy ending, although it is done smoothly enough so as not to
ruin the overall feel of the picture. Even with this coda in place, we
are left with a sense of satisfaction, of a story well told. And while
Chaplin had done several strong and emotionally involving shorts before
this, the Vagabond is perhaps the first one in which you could take out
all the comedy and still be left with a decent drama. It was at this
point that the little tramp really gained the stature to become a
leading man.
0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
David Jeffers for SIFFblog.com, 10 September 2007
Author:
rdjeffers from Seattle
Monday September 10, 7:00 pm, The Paramount Theater, Seattle
A clear departure from his work with Keystone and Essanany, Charles
Chaplin's third production for Mutual Film Corporation, The Vagabond
(1916) demonstrates a turn toward the more complex story development
and balanced content found in early features such as, A Dog's Life
(1918) and The Kid (1921).
A saloon violinist (Chaplin) plays outside a small establishment, then
solicits the patrons who mistake him for a member of the band also
playing. He flees the ensuing altercation and discovers a waif, The
Gypsy Drudge (Edna Purviance), held captive by cruel gypsies on a
country road. He plays for her until the Chief (Eric Campbell) appears
and beats them both. Charlie rescues the girl who is later discovered
by a traveling artist. When her portrait is seen my her mother in a
gallery the girl is rescued. Charlie is left alone, but the girl
realizes her true love and returns for him.
| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Plot summary | Amazon.com summary | Ratings |
| External reviews | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |