MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 28,416 this week

King Lear (1916)

 -  Drama  -  17 December 1916 (USA)
5.8
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.8/10 from 33 users  
Reviews: 3 user | 1 critic

Lear is an old man blind to his weaknesses. He decides to divide his kingdom among his three daughters according to who recites the best declaration of love. Goneril and Regan pretend to ... See full summary »

Director:

Writers:

(adaptation), (play)
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 200 titles
created 13 May 2011
 
a list of 7752 titles
created 13 Aug 2011
 
a list of 8 titles
created 01 Feb 2013
 
a list of 8569 titles
created 25 Mar 2013
 
list image
a list of 9883 titles
created 29 Oct 2013
 

Related Items

Search for "King Lear" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: King Lear (1916)

King Lear (1916) on IMDb 5.8/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of King Lear.

User Polls

Edit

Cast

Cast overview:
Frederick Warde ...
Lorraine Huling ...
Wayne Arey ...
The Duke of Albany
J.H. Gilmour ...
Hector Dion ...
Ernest C. Warde ...
Edwin Stanley ...
Boyd Marshall ...
Ina Hammer ...
Edith Diestel ...
Charles Brook ...
The Duke of Cornwall (as Charles Brooks)
Robert Whittier ...
Henry Ardsley ...
Edit

Storyline

Lear is an old man blind to his weaknesses. He decides to divide his kingdom among his three daughters according to who recites the best declaration of love. Goneril and Regan pretend to love him but treat him cruelly. Cordelia is loyal but, confusing honesty with insolence, he disowns her. Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

17 December 1916 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (cut)

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Version of King Lear (1974) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Try reading Cineanalyst's review for some good background information.
20 August 2010 | by (Bradenton, Florida) – See all my reviews

Considering that Cineanalyst's review talks about the different versions of Lear and the abysmal quality of the Televista print, there isn't a lot of need for me to go over all this again. Suffice to say, this version I am reviewing is the most complete but also an amazingly ugly print--something true of every Televista film I have seen. This company constantly brings the most obscure films to DVD (a major plus) and never restores them in any way--and many are barely watchable. Considering how few people want to see these obscure films, I guess I can understand why no restoration work is done--it's just a shame they are so gosh-darn ugly.

As far as "King Lear" goes, it may seem pretty poor to modern audiences because the acting is occasionally overdone, there is little in the way of suspense (such as Glouchester immediately recognizing his son in the film) and the costumes are mostly wrong (like they are from some Biblical epic). However, despite these limitations, the film is very good for 1916 and the essence of Shakespeare's tale is all here.

I'll be honest--this is the sort of film that would not appeal to most people. But, if you are a cinephile or silent film freak, it's well worth seeing--especially if you compare it to the various other silent versions (I think this one is best). Not without its charms--this one holds up fairly well today.


0 of 0 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Release Date King Lear (1916) pjap-1
Discuss King Lear (1916) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?