The Spoilers (1914)

Director:

Colin Campbell

Writers:

Lanier Bartlett (scenario)
Rex Beach (novel) (play)

Release Date:

11 April 1914 (USA)

Genre:

Drama | Western

Tagline:

FROM THE FAMOUS BOOK BY REX BEACH

Plot Keywords:

Yukon | Based On Play | Based On Novel

Cast

  (Credited cast)

William Farnum	...	Roy Glenister
Kathlyn Williams	...	Cherry Malotte
Tom Santschi	...	Alex McNamara (as Thomas Santschi)
Bessie Eyton	...	Helen Chester
Frank Clark	...	Dextry (as Frank M. Clark)
Jack McDonald	...	Slap Jack (as Jack F. McDonald)
Wheeler Oakman	...	The Broncho Kid, alias of Drury
Norval MacGregor	...	Judge Stillman (as N. MacGregor)
William Ryno	...	Struve (as W.H. Ryno)
rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Marshall Farnum	...	Lawyer Wheatin
Jules White	...	Undetermined Role

Runtime:

110 min

Country:

USA

Language:

English

Color:

Black and White

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1

Sound Mix:

Silent

Company:

Selig Polyscope Company

Movie Connections:

Version of The Spoilers (1923)

First You Have To Explain....

At the top of the comments page is a request: if you've seen this title, please write a review for others. But there is so much to explain about this movie before a useful comment can be made, that it becomes a meaningful problem.

First and foremost, this is a silent picture in black and white. This means that, at the time I write this review, perhaps one person in ten thousand would be willing to see it at all. The prejudice against black and white movies is, I feel, foolish, but silent movies pose an even greater problem to the modern moviegoer. As brilliant as they may be, it is usually only the great comedies that make any sense to modern moviegoers. Silent movies are rewarding, yes, but they are not meant for the passive moviegoer who sits down and says "Entertain me!" You must pay attention. You must understand that you are dealing with a society that is long gone. Are there a hundred people alive in 2005 who saw this movie ninety-one years ago?

The last and foremost problem is that this is not a movie such as you are used to, a series of pictures that tell a story with occasional titles to convey dialogue or scene-setting. No, the titles tell the story and the movie illustrates it. This movie-making technique was dying out when this movie was made.

If you are willing to put in the work to look at this movie, here are some of the things you might wish to look for.

First, the prints available seem to be in good shape, but there seem to be issues with the continuity. Perhaps someone went back and edited the movie to make it shorter, and did a bad job. Perhaps when this print was assembled, there were technical issues with the cutting continuity. The acting is primitive, even by the standards of the era.

Nonetheless, the movie was a smash hit and made its star, Dustin Farnum, such a star that for twenty years after, women named their babies after him, including the mother of Dustin Hoffman.

The good points of this movie are that it is much more complicated than later versions of this often-filmed movie. It hints at the complexity and philosophic issues of the Rex Beach novel it is based on. True, this makes characters appear out of nowhere and vanish just as suddenly, but such issues are not restricted to movies more than ninety years old.

It also has some beautiful cinematography, particularly the early, ship-bound sequences which seem to have been filmed on actual ships of the era. And once the action gets going, it gets moving fast, with explosions and fistfights aplenty.

So, is this movie worth your time? I'm afraid you'll have to look at it and tell me.