MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 1,975 this week

The Life and Death of King Richard III (1912)
"Richard III" (original title)

 -  Drama  -  15 October 1912 (USA)
5.7
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.7/10 from 162 users  
Reviews: 7 user | 1 critic

Richard of Gloucester uses manipulation and murder to gain the English throne.

Writers:

, (play)
0Check in
0Share...

On Disc

at Amazon

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 49 titles
created 15 Oct 2011
 
a list of 1001 titles
created 05 Nov 2011
 
a list of 4703 titles
created 14 Jan 2012
 
a list of 31 titles
created 20 Feb 2012
 
a list of 73 titles
created 09 Aug 2013
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: The Life and Death of King Richard III (1912)

The Life and Death of King Richard III (1912) on IMDb 5.7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of The Life and Death of King Richard III.

Photos

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

A religious woman seeks to save her people from destruction by seducing and murdering the enemy leader, but her plans get complicated once she falls for him.

Director: D.W. Griffith
Stars: Blanche Sweet, Henry B. Walthall, Mae Marsh
Cabiria (1914)
Adventure | Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

Three centuries before Christus. Young Cabiria is kidnapped by some pirates during one eruption of the Etna. She is sold as a slave in Carthage, and as she is just going to be sacrificed to... See full summary »

Director: Giovanni Pastrone
Stars: Italia Almirante-Manzini, Lidia Quaranta, Bartolomeo Pagano
Adventure | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.2/10 X  

Two love triangles intersect in ancient Pompei.

Directors: Mario Caserini, Eleuterio Rodolfi
Stars: Fernanda Negri Pouget, Eugenia Tettoni Fior, Ubaldo Stefani
King Lear (TV Movie 1983)
Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

An aging King invites disaster when he abdicates to his corrupt, toadying daughters and rejects his one loving, but honest one.

Director: Michael Elliott
Stars: Laurence Olivier, Colin Blakely, Anna Calder-Marshall
Drama | Fantasy | Horror
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

A poor student rescues a beautiful countess and soon becomes obsessed with her. A sorcerer makes a deal with the young man to give him fabulous wealth and anything he wants, if he will sign... See full summary »

Director: Stellan Rye
Stars: Paul Wegener, John Gottowt, Grete Berger
Othello (1965)
Drama | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.4/10 X  

A general's marriage is destroyed when a vengeful lieutenant convinces him that his new wife has been unfaithful.

Director: Stuart Burge
Stars: Laurence Olivier, Frank Finlay, Maggie Smith
Comedy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

With her family in financial difficulties, Rebecca is sent to live with her two strict, unfeeling aunts, who do not appreciate the young girl's charm and energy. Rebecca must make new ... See full summary »

Director: Marshall Neilan
Stars: Mary Pickford, Eugene O'Brien, Helen Jerome Eddy
Quo Vadis? (1913)
Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  
Director: Enrico Guazzoni
Stars: Amleto Novelli, Gustavo Serena, Amelia Cattaneo
Cinderella (1914)
Fantasy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.9/10 X  

Based on the fairy tale: Cinderella is mistreated by her stepmother and stepsisters, but is able to go to the royal ball through the help of the Fairy Godmother.

Director: James Kirkwood
Stars: Mary Pickford, Owen Moore, Isabel Vernon
Cleopatra (1917)
Biography | Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.9/10 X  

The story of Cleopatra, the fabulous queen of Egypt, and the epic romances between her and the greatest men of Rome, Julius Caesar and Antony.

Director: J. Gordon Edwards
Stars: Theda Bara, Fritz Leiber, Thurston Hall
Comedy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  

Charlie talks wealthy farmer's daughter Tillie into eloping with him (and taking her father's money). In the city Tillie gets drunk and lands in jail while Charlie runs off with her money ... See full summary »

Directors: Mack Sennett, Charles Bennett
Stars: Charles Chaplin, Marie Dressler, Mabel Normand
Biography | Crime | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

True story of notorious Australian outlaw Ned Kelly (1855-80).

Director: Charles Tait
Stars: Elizabeth Tait, John Tait, Norman Campbell
Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
Robert Gemp ...
Frederick Warde ...
Richard, Duke of Gloucester, afterward Richard III
Albert Gardner ...
James Keane ...
George Moss ...
Howard Stuart ...
Virginia Rankin ...
Violet Stuart ...
Carey Lee ...
Carlotta De Felice ...
Edit

Storyline

Shakespeare's tragedy of the hump-backed Duke of Gloucester, who rises to the throne of England by chicanery, treachery, and brilliance, only to find that his own methods have prepared the groundwork for his downfall. Written by Jim Beaver <jumblejim@prodigy.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama

Edit

Details

Country:

|

Language:

Release Date:

15 October 1912 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

III. Richárd  »

Box Office

Budget:

$30,000 (estimated)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

| (hand-tinted)

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Far from being a representation of a typical stage production of the play when the film was made, star Frederick Warde related in his autobiography that "I found the action of the camera necessitated entirely different methods of acting from the stage. Spontaneity must be replaced by deliberation and concentrated expression take the place of words. I had much to learn and considerable to unlearn but the director and photographer were very considerate, although my ignorance of the necessities of the camera must have tried their patience almost to the limit." See more »

Connections

Version of Richard III (1908) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Definitely a Film, Not a Play
11 February 2007 | by (Backwoods Canada) – See all my reviews

The viewer would do well to compare this film with Frank Benson's British film of the same play released in 1911, one year before Warde's. Both the similarities and differences are illuminating. The costumes are of course very similar--it would be years before modern dress Shakespeare would get onto film. The way the scenes of Edward's court are set are very similar. Such scenes were the staple of Victorian Shakespeare. Both films use narrative title cards to explain to the viewer what is going on; later in the silent era they would contain dialogue more than narration. The similarities show us what was the state of Shakespearean production and cinema standards at the time.

The major difference that one sees is that Benson tries to put you in row fifteen of the Drury lane theatre during one of his performances. The camera never moves and every shot is a long shot. You can't see Benson's face in any of them. All have what is clearly a stage set behind them, and the actors move from side to side primarily because they feel constrained by the backdrop and the footlights.

Warde's approach is best shown in a scene where Richard is riding to the Tower to do in Henry VI. It is shot outside on location. The camera is raised above head level. Richard rides from the distance toward the camera passing behind the camera to the right. It is a scene only possible in film; you could never see such a thing on stage.

Warde's camera is consistently closer to the action than Benson's so that the actor's faces are usually visible. He makes use of high level cameras to see Richard on a balcony and a crowd below and intercuts these with interiors so that one imagines the balcony to be attached to the interior.

In other words, the scenes here are conceived cinematically not theatrically. Warde was not the first to do this even in a Shakespeare film but it does make his film easier and more interesting to watch than his contemporary's.

Alas, his characterization of Richard leaves something to be desired; he stomps about like a troll from a Brothers Grimm story. Before closeups became standard, the only tool an actor could use in a silent film was his bodily movement, and Warde's lacks the subtlety to convey anything more than a caricature. As a result the film, despite being of historical interest, reasonably well paced and shot with a cinematic eye, will fail, I think, to really grip most modern viewers' interest.


3 of 3 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
rubbish wapdoy1

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?