MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 27,758 this week

The Life and Death of King Richard III (1912)
"Richard III" (original title)

 -  Drama  -  15 October 1912 (USA)
5.8
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.8/10 from 155 users  
Reviews: 7 user | 1 critic

Shakespeare's tragedy of the hump-backed Duke of Gloucester, who rises to the throne of England by chicanery, treachery, and brilliance, only to find that his own methods have prepared the ... See full summary »

Writers:

, (play)
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 24 titles
created 15 Oct 2011
 
a list of 50 titles
created 30 May 2012
 
a list of 96 titles
created 16 Jun 2012
 
a list of 476 titles
created 8 months ago
 
list image
a list of 191 titles
created 3 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: The Life and Death of King Richard III (1912)

The Life and Death of King Richard III (1912) on IMDb 5.8/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of The Life and Death of King Richard III.

Photos

Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
Robert Gemp ...
Frederick Warde ...
Richard, Duke of Gloucester, afterward Richard III
Albert Gardner ...
James Keane ...
George Moss ...
Howard Stuart ...
Virginia Rankin ...
Violet Stuart ...
Carey Lee ...
Carlotta De Felice ...
Edit

Storyline

Shakespeare's tragedy of the hump-backed Duke of Gloucester, who rises to the throne of England by chicanery, treachery, and brilliance, only to find that his own methods have prepared the groundwork for his downfall. Written by Jim Beaver <jumblejim@prodigy.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama

Edit

Details

Country:

|

Language:

Release Date:

15 October 1912 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Richard III  »

Box Office

Budget:

$30,000 (estimated)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

| (hand-tinted)

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Far from being a representation of a typical stage production of the play when the film was made, star Frederick Warde related in his autobiography that "I found the action of the camera necessitated entirely different methods of acting from the stage. Spontaneity must be replaced by deliberation and concentrated expression take the place of words. I had much to learn and considerable to unlearn but the director and photographer were very considerate, although my ignorance of the necessities of the camera must have tried their patience almost to the limit." See more »

Connections

Version of Richard III (1973) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Excellent early American feature
25 February 2009 | by See all my reviews

Watching Shakespeare without dialog isn't as challenging as you might think. Indeed, this 1912 film manages to condense the play neatly and still retains much of the power of the piece without hearing - or even reading - the words. Much of the success of "Richard III" is due to the vivid characterization by Frederick Warde, but his costars are excellent too. The direction is basic, of course, and every so often director-star James Keane wastes precious time (what's up with that long semi-tracking shot of the ship?), but generally his work is more than adequate. Comparing Keane's work here to the pioneering 1911 Italian feature "L'Inferno", it's clear that the American did have knowledge of what was going on elsewhere, even if he (of course) fell far short of what D.W. Griffith was already doing. Overall, "Richard III" will be of considerable interest to silent-film fans as well as stage performers interested in viewing the work of 19th century master Warde. Otherwise, I doubt this movie will thrill many other viewers. But I could be wrong; check it out for yourself.


1 of 2 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
rubbish wapdoy1

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?