| Index | 3 reviews in total |
1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
The First Film Adaptation Of The Jules Verne Sci-fi Classic, 22 July 2011
![]()
Author:
IPreferEvidence from Finland
Its looks awesome as many other Melies' films do but its hardly very
true to the book.
Obviously you can't go that deep into the book in such a short time but
as some other films like Frankenstein(1910) managed to do it so I don't
see why Melies couldn't other than the fact that this is from a time
when title cards were not used yet.
Basically what we get is a montage of Melies style painted backgrounds
and creatures which keeps you interested for a few minutes.
Recommended for fans of OLD sci-fi and fans Melies or Verne, or if you
just have a few minutes to spare
0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
A misleading French title..., 20 September 2011
![]()
Author:
planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida
Oddly, the English title for this is "Under the Seas"--even though the
French title is translated as "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" ("Deux
Cent Milles Sous les Mers"). However, when you see the film, you see
that it really has nothing to do with the Verne novel--and the English
title was more appropriate and less misleading.
When the film begins, it's obvious that this one is in among the worst
condition of any of the films from this Georges Méliès DVD collection.
It's very fuzzy and bleached out--and it's a real shame. As the rest of
the films looked like they'd been restored, perhaps this one was beyond
their ability to repair.
Like some of the shorts on the "Georges Méliès Encore" DVD, this one
has optional narration in order to explain what is occurring. While
normally I don't recommend it, in this case it's worth using (at least
in the beginning). A man enters a sub and the submarine slowly descends
as the crowd watches. Then, you see what is supposed to be an
underwater scene. It's done using stop-motion, real fish and painted
images. It must have been pretty cool back in 1907--but it looks pretty
dated today. Then, things get weird. Starfish turn into dancing
girls--yes, dancing girls! Sadly, the ship scares them off! But, at
least the guy in the boat gets to see some mermaids--and leaves the
boat (and seems to be breathing just fine!). Then, he wanders about the
set--acting as if he's seeing a magical underwater garden. A bit later,
he's attacked by octopi--who also turn into women. How can all this
be?! Not a bad film by 1907's standards, but the underwater scenes when
seen today are amazingly cheesy and a bit quaint. Worth seeing, but not
exactly among Georges Méliès best.
0 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Melies Take on the Novel, 27 August 2011
Author:
Michael_Elliott from Louisville, KY
20000 lieues sous les mers (1907)
*** (out of 4)
aka 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea
There's no question that this adaptation if more Melies than Jules
Verne so fans of the classic novel really shouldn't come here expecting
some sort of faithful version. What we see is the maker of a submarine
who takes it to the bottom of the ocean where he witnesses various
things ranging from mermaids to giant fish to sea horses. While at the
bottom of the sea the man must figure out a way to reach land again. At
just over 10-minutes there's obviously not enough time to be faithful
to the novel but at the same time I don't think Melies would have been
faithful had the film ran for two-hours. It's pretty clear that Melies
is just wanting to use his bag of tricks at the bottom of the ocean and
for the most part this makes for some entertainment. One scene that
isn't very entertaining is a rather long sequence where we see some
females doing a dance at the bottom of the ocean. I think the film is
at its best when the director shows off the creations including the
giant fish and a giant crab who attacks our hero. It should go without
saying but these creatures certainly don't look real by today's
standards but I think they contain a certain charm that really adds
some value to the movie. The film never becomes too long, which is
certainly a good thing and fans of science fiction should be
entertained throughout.
| Ratings | External reviews | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |