18 July 2013 7:13 AM, PDT | Obsessed with Film | See recent Obsessed with Film news »

As time goes on, I don’t look at the early 2000′s kindly in terms of cinematic output. Not to say there wasn’t some great films from the era (and there have definitely been time periods with more dismal films than the early 2000′s), but on average, movies from this time just didn’t pack a punch.

It is hard to say why exactly, but I think the industry might have been in a transitional period in terms of artistic leadership. The directors from the previous generation seemed to be running out of creative steam, while some of the younger talent (the Christopher Nolan, David Fincher, and Darren Aronofskys’ of the world) were still finding their feet and hadn’t broken through enough to demand the respect of the studios. This in turn affected performances of the era, for no matter how talented they may be as thespians, actors »

- Christopher Lominac

Report a problem

Similar News Items

Christopher Nolan (I)
Tom Hanks
David Fincher

IMDb.com, Inc. takes no responsibility for the content or accuracy of the above news articles, Tweets, or blog posts. This content is published for the entertainment of our users only. The news articles, Tweets, and blog posts do not represent IMDb's opinions nor can we guarantee that the reporting therein is completely factual. Please visit the source responsible for the item in question to report any concerns you may have regarding content or accuracy.

See our NewsDesk partners