4 February 2012 4:08 PM, PST | The Guardian - Film News | See recent The Guardian - Film News news »

Geoff Dyer's irreverent commentary on one of cinema's most 'difficult' offerings is a free-wheeling delight

The films of Andrei Tarkovsky, and in particular his 1979 classic Stalker, have a reputation for being among the most difficult in cinema. Difficult, not just in the sense of intellectually demanding, but difficult as in hard to sit through, long and slow-moving and potentially very boring. Perhaps only the work of the Hungarian director Béla Tarr is viewed (or not, in most cases) with greater trepidation. Cinema buffs wear their familiarity with films such as Stalker and Tarr's seven-hour Sátántangó like a badge of honour and speak of them in reverential tones. Most other people regard them like non-mountaineers regard Everest: "I'm sure it's a great mountain, but damned if I'm climbing it."

In his new book, Geoff Dyer sets out to address this problem by articulating what he loves so much about Stalker »

- Killian Fox

Report a problem



Similar News Items

Lars von Trier
"Top Gear" (2002)
Antichrist (2009)


IMDb.com, Inc. takes no responsibility for the content or accuracy of the above news articles, Tweets, or blog posts. This content is published for the entertainment of our users only. The news articles, Tweets, and blog posts do not represent IMDb's opinions nor can we guarantee that the reporting therein is completely factual. Please visit the source responsible for the item in question to report any concerns you may have regarding content or accuracy.

See our NewsDesk partners