Home
search
more | tips

26 November 2008 10:39 AM, PST | From Studio Briefing - Film News | See recent Studio Briefing - Film News news

Like his previous film, Moulin Rouge, Baz Luhrmann's Australia is receiving wildly mixed reviews. The $130-million epic has had some writers describing it as Australia's Gone With the Wind, and that film is being used as the benchmark critics are using to assess it. Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times says that Luhrman has been able to recreate much of GWTW's "lush epic beauty and some of the same awkwardness with a national legacy of racism. ... What a gorgeous film, what strong performances, what exhilarating images and -- yes, what sweeping romantic melodrama. The kind of movie that is a movie, with all that the word promises and implies." But Claudia Puig in USA Today twists similar words around, writing that the movie "tries to be a sprawling, romantic epic. Instead, it's a melodramatic exercise in tedium. Rather than being old-fashioned or classic, it's old-school and conventional. Instead of believable romance, it offers schmaltz and cliché." Manohla Dargis in the New York Times takes a position firmly in the middle, calling it: "A pastiche of genres and references wrapped up _ though, more often than not, whipped up _ into one demented and generally diverting horse-galloping, cattle-stampeding, camera-swooping, music-swelling, mood-altering widescreen package, this creation story about modern Australia is a testament to movie love at its most devout, cinematic spectacle at its most extreme, and kitsch as an act of aesthetic communion." Lou Lumenick in the New York Post puts it more succinctly: "Australia," he writes, "has it all -- unfortunately."


Report a problem


Similar News Items

Roger Ebert
Baz Luhrmann
Moulin Rouge! (2001)


See entire list of NewsDesk partners


IMDb.com, Inc. takes no responsibility for the content or accuracy of the above news articles. News articles are published for the entertainment of our users only. The news items do not represent IMDb's opinions nor can we guarantee that the reporting therein is completely factual. Please visit the site responsible for the article in question to report any concerns you may have.